Because Pace is Pace yaar.Why are we still selecting Wood over Atkinson?
R00t IMO.Still got to bowl at least one over from LL or Ali, maybe more as Wood is giving away a boundary an over.
Yeah I thought maybe umpires call on stumps too but he got a long way acrossI was very surprised that was three reds.
Looked like it was missing comfortably.
I don’t know too many people who currently rate him that highly tbh. I think they rate his potential but certainly not what he’s delivered since the last home summer.I think Cameron Green is overrated and that's the hill i will die on i suppose
lucky might be a stretch, plenty of chances to take wickets in conditions favoured him you'd have to say sensible, as was Woakes and Archer who also took 16+ Problem is, as with many England bowlers, they don't often travel wellYeah, ODIs are Wood's weakest format by far. With hindsight lucky that his best ODI bowling came in the home WC.
Would have liked to see Atkinson given a go. Otherwise why is he there? We deliberately took a ton of pace bowlers at the expense of batting reserves, presumably so they could rotate. If they won't play the younger guy when our best bowler is injured and out the tournament, other bowlers are out of form and our side is de facto eliminated already, when are they gonna pick him?Atkinson might not have fared any better, but may as well have played over Wood. Willey had his two good game by looks
This over? This match? The whole ****ing tournament?Well this sucks.
All three.This over? This match? The whole ****ing tournament?
To read most of my compatriots you’d think Australia were 350-2. I’d say it’s in the balanceRain break in our game, whos on top here?