• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Tendulkar vs Keith Miller

Better cricketer?


  • Total voters
    32

Patience and Accuracy+Gut

State Vice-Captain
Female intuition?
You are basically acting like standards have remained same since 3-5 decades of Viv’s time and acting like how the game went to different league in like 15 years between Miller and Viv.

The game is way better to what Viv’s played objectively and Viv averaged just over 50 in his era. All the member of the fab 4 average the same in a higher standard sport.
 

kyear2

International Coach
You are basically acting like standards have remained same since 3-5 decades of Viv’s time and acting like how the game went to different league in like 15 years between Miller and Viv.

The game is way better to what Viv’s played objectively and Viv averaged just over 50 in his era. All the member of the fab 4 average the same in a higher standard sport.
You believe that there's a single bowler today better than Lillee, Imran or Hadlee?
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
You believe that there's a single bowler today better than Lillee, Imran or Hadlee?
Cummins arguably. Maybe not as great as Hadlee but hey we'll get a better picture by the end of his career. Bumrah when fit and Rabada are amazing too.
 

kyear2

International Coach
Nah there are multiple.

In all seriousness though the average attack is probably better these days.
Ok, this is hypocritical. Because I'm beyond positive that we had a discussion a few weeks ago when you maintained that Bradman would score the same today if not more because of how the attacks today aren't better than they were in his day. Now this?
 

Coronis

International Coach
Ok, this is hypocritical. Because I'm beyond positive that we had a discussion a few weeks ago when you maintained that Bradman would score the same today if not more because of how the attacks today aren't better than they were in his day. Now this?
Are you really sure?

Are you sure it wasn’t about better pitches and bats? And you know, growing up in this era? That sounds more like me tbh.
 

kyear2

International Coach
Are you really sure?

Are you sure it wasn’t about better pitches and bats? And you know, growing up in this era? That sounds more like me tbh.
No, but I'll look for it. We were talking about bowling attacks. Pitches may have come into it, but not as the primary point, but nothing were as flat as his home pitches.
 

Top