'The Aus side is still as good as any' is pretty wild as far as statements going. It isn't nearly as good as previous Australian sides, and it's not as good as a few other sides in this competition. This side is like swiss cheese, there's holes all over the show.You know what this is all horse**** anyway and without the nothing player Stoinis there wouldn't even be an issue. While it's tempting to blame personnel for losing and pretend you have better options at home, sometimes your best players just play poorly and/or are not good enough. On paper the Aus side is still as good as any, but cricket isn't played on paper. The solution is to field better and bat better and bowl better to their potential, which is clearly not happening.
The main obvious personnel issues with this side are Stoinis and maybe Marnus' lack of proven performance. Both of which are solved with Head coming back (then Marnus wouldn't be there) and Green playing instead of Stoinis (which he definitely should be). So they can be solved easily.
The real personnel issues are not having a performing keeper/bat or spinner. Agar's injury probably hurts with this. At full strength they should be fine and there's no issue with team balance the more I think about it.
Blaming tOo mAnY aLl rOuNdErS is ignorance. It's just Stoinis
But yeah, it is insane that Stoinis still gets picked. His ODI numbers are just next level shithouse. Shows that the Grade Cricketer is right, if you have a decent rig you can hold your spot at any level.