JR has seven years left on his term so maybe then if he retires and/or loses.
90scricketfan fuming RN
If I’m still here in 7 years I’ll be hounding you.
If I still have the Bushrangers avatar imposed on me at that point then just ban me tbh.
www.espncricinfo.com
www.espncricinfo.com
Thanks for actually answering the OP.This is one heck of a World XI in the 1977/78 WSC.
vs Cricket Scorecard, 1st Match at Sydney, January 14 - 19, 1978
Get cricket scorecard of 1st Match, vs , WSC World XI tour of Australia 1977/78 at RAS Showground, Sydney dated January 14 - 19, 1978.
And, to my mind, this is the strongest XI that the ROW put out against England in 1970.
ENG vs ROWXI Cricket Scorecard at Birmingham, July 16 - 21, 1970
Get cricket scorecard of ENG vs ROWXI, Rest of the World XI tour of England 1970 at Edgbaston, Birmingham dated July 16 - 21, 1970.
Looking at the 1971/72 scorecards, the ROW sides that played against England in 1970 were stronger than the World XIs that played in Australia 18 months later. And they were actually successful, unlike the World XI that was wallopped by Australia in 2005. So my vote goes to the WSC side or 1970 ROW side that I've posted here.
Yeah that team is ridiculous. Only just barely won too!
That 77/78 team were all around their prime too. The 70 team was weaker bowling wise.
Lets not pretend Procter, Barlow and Pollock weren’t in their primes around 1970 - they’d all just come off a very successful series vs Australia. Gibbs though was definitely a bit past it and Intikhab was never that great.