subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Following from Kyear2s thread, which is a better duo to have assuming you are a mid level team?
Done.Should have included a poll. Plus it should be in playerscomparison section.
this easilyMcGrath/Tendulkar
I even voted for Sobers + Imran in the other poll so it'd be silly for me to be not sure here.Funny how both sides are so sure.
McGrath's batting and Tendulkar's bowling - What good are they.Funny how both sides are so sure.
IMO, it's because of looking at it in a different way.Funny how both sides are so sure.
How can one be more incorrect?Also there is the highly erroneous assumption that I think a lot of people are coming to based on career averages, that Kallis & Sachin are approxmately equal in batting, and that McGrath & Imran are in bowling.
Depends again on the team.IMO, it's because of looking at it in a different way.
The Imran/Kallis crowd are looking at theoretical cumulative averages and concluding they come out on top
In practice though the McGrath/Tendulkar will get better results and win more games of cricket. McGrath factor alone makes the difference, with his record at getting out the best batsmen.
Also there is the highly erroneous assumption that I think a lot of people are coming to based on career averages, that Kallis & Sachin are approxmately equal in batting, and that McGrath & Imran are in bowling.
I think my question is answered.Depends again on the team.
A weak team would prefer the specialists to shore up their batting and bowling first IMO whereas a strong team who already have their bases covered would prefer the all-rounders to enhance the team options.