• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Garry Sobers v Imran Khan,Test Cricket:Poll

Who was the better Test cricketer: Imran or Sobers?


  • Total voters
    169

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
He barely scraps top 10 in my list and that's the only thing that matters.

????

But i want to know the reasoning behind him being no. 2. So enlighten me

I said a contender for no 2.

It is very hard to split the likes of Hobbs, Hutton, Sobers, Viv, Tendulkar, Lara, and Smith.
 

Adorable Asshole

International Regular
He barely scraps top 10 in my list and that's the only thing that matters.

????

But i want to know the reasoning behind him being no. 2. So enlighten me

I said a contender for no 2.

It is very hard to split the likes of Hobbs, Hutton, Sobers, Viv, Tendulkar, Lara, and Smith.
Sobers stands out as the only one who batted most of his career at 5 or below.
 

Slifer

International Captain
Sobers batted anywhere from opening down to number 9. But he made runs from 3 down to 7. Of his 160 innings he batted 50 innings in the top 4 and averaged in excess of 60. He batted mostly from 5 to 6 because that was the needs of the team. And also, after bowling a ton of overs, naturally, he'd be tired and who would risk their best batsman potentially facing the new ball straight up (WI openers were poor outside of Sir Conrad).

Fact remains, and this is a compliment to sir Gary, is that he could bat anywhere in the batting order and still make runs. Had he played higher up more, (he played sufficient) no doubt he'd still make runs.
 
Last edited:

shortpitched713

International Captain
Sobers stands out as the only one who batted most of his career at 5 or below.
6 or lower are more challenging batting spots than the 4 spot. Arguably, it's a bit wasteful of a talent like his, but that's a tactical argument, not one against his skill and ability which is goated.

Besides that, he did great anywhere from 3 to 7, so this is a strange hill to fight him on. This is not Sarfaraz Khan in Indian domestic cricket, Sobers actually could and did "do it" at the premier batting spots. He just chose not to quite often (my guess is it depended on how tired he felt from bowling output in a given innings).
 

kyear2

International Coach
If we are only taking batting and bowling in consideration then there is not much between them to septate but Sobers was far better fielder than Imran and I don't think captaincy is that much of skill to offset that.
I agree that it's close, but would give Sobers the edge with regards to primary skills for reasons as discussed above. Agree the secondary skills are a bit over stated for both and a wash.
Where Sobers separates as you said is in his fielding, it's just no contest there.
 
Last edited:

kyear2

International Coach
Is it surprising? Batting at the top is significantly harder than batted down the order.
Look at his record up the order, it wasn't that he couldn't do it.
The main reason he batted down the order was because he was over bowled, over bowled him self (again to his detriment) and needed the rest. His best and ideal position position was either 3 or 4.
 

Slifer

International Captain
imo he has a noticeable weakness against Kiwis. Can’t even call it sample size, 12/93 tests is pretty decent.
Weakness? More like a head scratcher tbh. NZ were in no way shape or form a strong team during his time and most of his contemporaries had at least a decent record vs NZ.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Weakness? More like a head scratcher tbh. NZ were in no way shape or form a strong team during his time and most of his contemporaries had at least a decent record vs NZ.
Were NZ yours an addendum to Aus tours back then? Going from the Caribbean to NZ without visiting Aus at all can't have been a thing, I imagine. Maybe he just had a cbf attitude to the NZ series after playing Aus which was a big deal.
 

Top