subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
KP could have done that and then failed the rest of the series.Flower made an unbeaten hundred against Walsh and ambrose on a pitch where no other batsman managed a fifty.
KP could have done that and then failed the rest of the series.Flower made an unbeaten hundred against Walsh and ambrose on a pitch where no other batsman managed a fifty.
I've watched that innings several times and while being dropped is part of cricket, it highlights the issue with such small samples because Flower was dropped a few times on that occasion and on another day that wouldn't be part of his resume against other players.Flower made an unbeaten hundred against Walsh and ambrose on a pitch where no other batsman managed a fifty.
Coulda WouldaKP could have done that and then failed the rest of the series.
Brother, I don't really care about the quality of the innings I don't have a clue. But "SENA" only became a thing because WI declined . Getting a hundred in WI in that era surely means more than if he got one against Mullally or Dion Nash ffs.I've watched that innings a few times and while being dropped is part of cricket, it highlights the issue with such small samples because Flower was dropped a few times on that occasion and on another day that wouldn't be part of his resume against other players.
Yeah it's one of his best knocksBrother, I don't really care about the quality of the innings I don't have a clue. But "SENA" only became a thing because WI declined . Getting a hundred in WI in that era surely means more than if he got one against Mullally or Dion Nash ffs.
So tough to assess when he didn't play very much against, Australia/England/South Africa in my humble opinion. His performance in India was very noteworthy when he pretty spent the entire test on the field in one shape or form.The result was Flower 22-19 Pietersen and I voted for Flower, but there are convincing arguments that Flower generally isn't proven enough against pace bowling.
PlayerComparisons doesWait do people care about the results of these polls? I just vote for which player I like best (I.e the England player or Shahid Afridi) and move on with my life
Imagine liking Shahid Afridi lol.Wait do people care about the results of these polls? I just vote for which player I like best (I.e the England player or Shahid Afridi) and move on with my life
So what if there’s a poll with an England player vs Afridi?!Wait do people care about the results of these polls? I just vote for which player I like best (I.e the England player or Shahid Afridi) and move on with my life
Nah flowers a level or two above Kp. Not even closeI think Pietersen is generally a bit overrated but Flower doesn't have a hundred in SENA. Don't think that's an inexplicable result.
I would probably put Sehwag over Flower by a small marginNah flowers a level or two above Kp. Not even close