subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Give your ranking of the World Cups you have seen based on sheer entertainment value and quality of play.
Why is the 1983 win for India not regarded high? India and Kapil did it when no one gave them a chance against the mighty Windies. And it has been a massive trigger for the game's following in India and the complete domination over hockey.1992 first 2019 second 1996 and 2003 next rest don't really stand out to me.
I was not born then m ranking the ones i watchedWhy is the 1983 win for India not regarded high? India and Kapil did it when no one gave them a chance against the mighty Windies. And it has been a massive trigger for the game's following in India and the complete domination over hockey.
Interesting. For me, the 2003 WC didn't live up to the hype simply because the semis and final were all one-sided.2003 was packed with ODI ATGs, almost the entire Aussie team, the Indian batting lineup, Kumble, Lara, Donald, Pollock, the Pakistani team and many more.
2011, 2015 and 2019 were nice too but do not hold the same special place as the 2003 World Cup did.
Yeah there was somethin special about that WC. I actually think it transformed cricket tremendously by introducing SL as a force, shifting the attention of the modern game to the SC and had so many high profile moments.1.1996
It was an emotion , it showed what we can do on the big stage, nobody thought this tiny Island can go on and claim the biggest prize but Sri Lanka did it , and we played entertaining cricket ..
Jayasuriya won POTT but really it should have been Aravinda De Silva. He was magical in this tournament..Playing the big knocks in the crunch games vs India in the semi final and final v Australia
It has a more emotional connect for me, I was getting to watch my cricketing heroes live on TV and the South African grounds are beautiful.Interesting. For me, the 2003 WC didn't live up to the hype simply because the semis and final were all one-sided.