Ok took me a while to understand this gripe . Firstly on skills the two teams in question was very close in ratings and thus the game would be close and determined by smaller entities .This is what I hate about the stumped engine...
If this was Nick Smith taking my bowlers apart to win the game, I would not mind losing.
But to basically have two youngsters with no real observable skills that have likely been put on a 8/9 attacking skill and because the engine promotes attacking as better than playing circumstances the partnership of these two youngsters have likely lost the game for me... if I lose to a high skilled batsmen I don't care. The consistency of the engine promoting this sort of play bothers me.
But the consistency of winning/losing games to unexpected and statistically unlikely partnerships and low skill players is truly demoralizing in games where monies is everything and relegation can kill a team. And before anybody says that this happens in cricket... the whole point is it should be the exception not the norm, maybe once a season this should happen, not every second or third game.
And you can overcome it... by having a team that has far greater skill than the opponent, and this normalizes near the top where everybody has good teams. But if you are building the team and need monies because its truly the only way to become a competitive team in the long run, it hurts.
For me this game was won by your opponents bowling not batting , Their batting was more consistent over the coarse of their game than yours however this is also a reflection on your bowlers not doing what they suppose to , an absolute shocker by the one member in your team that Damien Moore capitulated this point .
This also brings me to another point here that consistency etc in stumped is based on experience . Your group and the member in question is young and will improve in this manner with the experience becoming higher , around 15 you will see a visible difference IMO . Your opponent had one member that was inexperienced however benefitted greatly from playing conditions being in favor of a wrist spinner also shown by your best performer a wrist spinner with figures of 3 for 17 in 3,2. In contrast your team only had a handful of players above 10 experience with your best performing bat being one .
I firmly believe the inconsistency your experiencing is due to having inexperienced players in senior games . However that's just my humbled opinion , if i misunderstood something or more is needed please let me know . I tried hard to understand the entire gripe but struggled a bit , just looked at the game from my view point and explained how i saw the result .