Not miles but still significantly betterOne of these bowlers was miles better than the other.
This is obviously true but on performances alone it's not that straightforward a discussion tbf. 2015 WC Starc was as dominant a bowling performance in a WC as anyone had seen.One of these bowlers was miles better than the other.
An economy rate of 3.88 versus 5.11 is more than significant.Not miles but still significantly better
Given the difference in what constitutes a decent score in 2000 vs 2020 it's not that signficant.An economy rate of 3.88 versus 5.11 is more than significant.
Yeah Mitchell's certainly had some clutch moments, but overall, and with the differential of wickets taken and RPO, you just can't build a case thatThis is obviously true but on performances alone it's not that straightforward a discussion tbf. 2015 WC Starc was as dominant a bowling performance in a WC as anyone had seen.
Doubtful. Pollock, Garner and Wasim are better.Mcgrath easily.economy. mcgrath is top 3 in ODI best bowlers ever, and top 3 in tests.
With all due respect, McGrath did this to himself.Can we please close this thread.
This is the greatest disrespect to Mcgrath since this,
View attachment 36370
galaxy brain takeIn Odis for me its
Regardless a Stunning attack to have together, only Pakistan can level this if warne and saqlain as the spinners are considered too
- Brett Lee
- Mitchell Starc
- Glenn McGrath
McGoat doesn't need no fielders.Starc and Lee need a ball, McGrath needs a ball and fielders.
Do keepers and slip not count as fielders?McGoat doesn't need no fielders.
64% of his of his wickets are by ‘caught’.McGoat doesn't need no fielders.
Members of the orchestra as the maestro crafts his masterpiece.Do keepers and slip don't count as fielders?
Thats an odd way to type McGrath needs fieldersMembers of the orchestra as the maestro crafts his masterpiece.