Prince EWS
Global Moderator
This is literally every stumping.When the ball is in the keepers hands and the batsmen isn't attempting a run, then most would consider the ball to be dead.
This is literally every stumping.When the ball is in the keepers hands and the batsmen isn't attempting a run, then most would consider the ball to be dead.
Plenty of miscues this innings too.Yeah but he also creamed most of them. Half of his Headingly runs came from skied miscues and he should have been out a dozen times
The umpire wasn't even watching because he'd turned to give the bowler his cap.
When the ball is in the keepers hands and the batsmen isn't attempting a run, then most would consider the ball to be dead.
By the rules it's out, and Bairstow was really poor but there have been plenty of fismissals down the years that leave a bitter taste and this another one.
They went won't change their approach and when it's 0-5 I hope they enjoy the warranted scrutiny.I hope our players are hurting from this defeat.
Root, Pope, Brook, Duckett- all out hooking when we were right on top.
Forget about the Bairstow dismissal etc, that's where we lost this match.
Some matches you lose, some the opposition win - this is very much in the former category for me.
Seriously I swear I see the ball being quietly thrown at the stumps like a dozen times a game and the batsman casually put his bat down, it happens all the time. This is the first time I've seen someone dismissed because they weren't though.They should make it so the ball is always live, you have to quickly leave your crease to pat down the pitch and rush back, batsmen can run when the bowler misses the ball getting thrown back to them, etc.
That was a blatant ****ing lie if there ever was one
"Ben Stokes says the decision was horrible."
Guess Cummins didn't like Flem's thread.
He actually tried to do that but he couldn't. People need to stop saying this, it really blows up in their faces.That was a blatant ****ing lie if there ever was one
Withdraw that over thrown boundary in the world cup final
Withdraw the de Grandhomme appeal last year! It's such a hilariously blatant lie.That was a blatant ****ing lie if there ever was one
Withdraw that over thrown boundary in the world cup final
Looks like Cummins read this forum quite often
imagine you bet on a run out on that wicket and then you see it come up as a stumping you’d be absolutely losing your marblesBy a literal interpretation of this there literally cannot ever be a stumping in cricket. The ball is in the keeper's hands and the batsman isn't attempting a run!
Obviously there's a big big difference between a normal stumping and this one (which is still a stumping!) but it goes to show how hard it is to write a law which makes this not out but still leaves stumpings out. The solution could be "let's not rules lawyer the game" but that'd last about five minutes.