But the catch wasn't completed yet. Cricket is a complex game.Fingers were underneath anyway
But the catch wasn't completed yet. Cricket is a complex game.Fingers were underneath anyway
It very much was though. I think it's the "not control of the body" I guess but he's caught that easily and simply is trying to get upright to celebrate.But the catch wasn't completed yet. Cricket is a complex game.
Yeah that was a clean catchThe ICC really need to clarify what is meant by "in control"." IMO starc was more in control of the ball and his body in that catch then smith was in the root one in the first innings of this test.
On the other hand we’ve never ever had anything go against us so this is a good post and you are very smartEngland have an amazing record with bad decisions in their favour. That, Stokes' ricochet 4, Stokes LBW and the famous Broad decision are 4 of the worst decisions seen in recent history
I mean the rules kind of matter. It's a really weird one IMO, my main thought is mostly "why the hell has he done that in the first place".Like away from the rules, can anybody actually look at that and say that he hasn't caught it
See the length of this seesion still less overs than expectedoh wow, 30 overs in a session somehow.
I mean you could just thank the umpires but sureOn the other hand we’ve never ever had anything go against us so this is a good post and you are very smart