If he can actually bat at somewhere near his best then yes but is he actually fit enough to do so? I really hope so but not at all sure.Yeah Stokes is being picked even if he can't bowl at all, and that's absolutely the right call imo.
Livingstone was selected for the tour of Pakistan but had to pull out injured.What about Livingstone ? It'd be funny to see Linvingstone & Root be the only spinners
Oh and Livingstone should open the batting with Duckett :
Duckett, Livingstone, Pope, Root, Brook, Stokes, Bairstow, Robinson, Broad, Wood/Woakes, Anderson
Theeeere's the best XI
Well there's Woakes, who's a better bowler, better bat, superior beard, superior eyesight.Apart from Root and Stokes that's probably the worst player we could have out since there's basically no replacement.
Probably the last time we played in South Africa. I think the last time we played without a spinner was Hobart, which didn't go well. The Aussies did play a spinner, but he didn't bowl, so not sure it was a tactical error by England.When was the last time we played no spinner and it was actually good?
Supposedly he has been asked. Answer pending...Moeen will do it if asked. You can put a ring around it.
The way he's been used by England under Baz, is to keep bowling even when getting smashed, which leaves the seamers fresh, and they've thrived on it TBH, rather than see Jimmeh or Broad coming into his 4th spell on the opening day, which invariably happens when we go without a spinner, or like under Root, showed no confidence in the twirler.Well there's Woakes, who's a better bowler, better bat, superior beard, superior eyesight.
I'm far from convinced we need to take a spot in our XI with a meh spinner when we have lots of better-than-meh seamers champing at the bit