I know...There's no way in hell they are sacking Crawley for Malan.
I know...There's no way in hell they are sacking Crawley for Malan.
He took pretty much all his wickets in that one game against Northants. Dawson does a really good jon for Hampshire but it is very much as an all rounder who is the 5th or sometimes even 6th bowler.It seems daft reasoning anyway. Swann went 8 years between his first England Tour and his Test debut.
Dawson's figures are a bit misleading this Summer, he's played in 6 matches, but only bowled in 6 innings. And even then he averages under 12 overs an innings. So his 9 wickets at 24 are a decent return, with an Econ at 3.14 quite key too. He also has 9 wickets at 12 (Econ 6.35) in the Blast. Hants have only taken 10 wickets by spin in total in the CC which would suggest he's not exactly played on friendly pitches.
IF, and it's an huge IF, Stokes really can bowl his quota, or close to it, I think I'd go for Ahmed, with a very different role then Leach, he's already taking a fiverfer in Tests.He took pretty much all his wickets in that one game against Northants. Dawson does a really good jon for Hampshire but it is very much as an all rounder who is the 5th or sometimes even 6th bowler.
It all comes back to the question of Stokes. If he can't bowl properly then none of these spin options really work. I say that as someone who absolutely loves Moeen and has followed Dawson for his whole career.
hahahahaThe must pick a spinner at all costs approach is just so self-evidently wrong and should be resisted. This is how Ian Blackwell, Gareth Batty, Chris Schofield and Richard Dawson ended up playing international cricket. Picking average/crap players at the expense of competent players simply because they can (supposedly) bowl spin just ends in direness.
Yeah that’s a fair point. Just let root throw down 10/12 a dayThe must pick a spinner at all costs approach is just so self-evidently wrong and should be resisted. This is how Ian Blackwell, Gareth Batty, Chris Schofield and Richard Dawson ended up playing international cricket. Picking average/crap players at the expense of competent players simply because they can (supposedly) bowl spin just ends in direness.
Yeah fair point this. It’s made it all pretty intriguing tbh, bad as it is for the guys who are injuredWhereas if the ball does more, then even Smith and Marnus will find it tough going and your other batsmen won't be able to cope.
I’m a Malan fan tbh. You watch him bat and he absolutely looks like he should excel at test cricket, but then he gets out. I genuinely think he’s a good player. Then again, I think the same of James Vince so make of that what you will.There's no way in hell they are sacking Crawley for Malan.
You clearly know Sweet FA then.Then again, I think the same of James Vince so make of that what you will.
Root throwing down 10-12 works as long as the seamers are taking wickets. If England have to bowl for a day and a half or more, then it becomes an issue. Especially when their quick rotation options for each test are now somewhat limited.Yeah that’s a fair point. Just let root throw down 10/12 a day
Australia spent years adhering to this policy post Warne and handed out caps like confetti to club standard bowlers like Doherty with predictable resultsThe must pick a spinner at all costs approach is just so self-evidently wrong and should be resisted. This is how Ian Blackwell, Gareth Batty, Chris Schofield and Richard Dawson ended up playing international cricket. Picking average/crap players at the expense of competent players simply because they can (supposedly) bowl spin just ends in direness.
Nah, Udal IMO.Bring back James Tredwell