social
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
That’s shortismHe seems to be batting better again since the brown nosed dwarf was sacked
Politically correct term is “gnome”
That’s shortismHe seems to be batting better again since the brown nosed dwarf was sacked
damn i can't believe sobers had an away average of 3.0414093e+64Quite.
Some big Home/Away differences for 50+ players.
Voges (duh) 86/49
Labu 70/39
Headley 77/47
Walcott 69/40
Compton 60/36
Yousuf 65/44
Weekes 69/49
Williamson 65/45
Pollock 68/49
Hussey 61/42
Hayden 57/41
Sobers 66/50!
Miandad 61/45
Shiv 58/45
Lara 58/47
Ponting 56/46
and flipping the coin
Barrington 50/69
Hammond 50/66
Border 45/56
Little surprised at Sobers difference, not that 50 away isn’t still outstanding of course.
Sachin's 59 avg in 2002 is better than 64 avg in 2010s ?Another thing is that Sachin, Sangakkara etc never actually ever averaged 60 overall. Smith once averaged what 64 or so and even now, he averages 61. That's nuts. And one doesn't have to cherry pick or any of that stuff with Smith
It is the same as contesting Sri Lankan and Indian pitches are roads while Murali, Ashwin and Jaddu took the wickets.
remember lanka has roads when sanga and jaya bat then miraculously turns them into spitting dustbowls when murali rolls in to bowl according to cw heheIt is the same as contesting Sri Lankan and Indian pitches are roads while Murali, Ashwin and Jaddu took the wickets.
This but unironicallySmith isn't even the 2nd best batsman in the current side
Travis > Marnus/ Usman > Smith
Damn. When do Bangladesh play Australia next?? They actually put up a fight against both Smith and Cummins.
Yeah they have been for the vast majority of their careers. I rate Cummins much higher than Smith as a result.
Didn’t want to get labelled a HTB so has kept his average at a mortal level at home. WAGYeah they have been for the vast majority of their careers. I rate Cummins much higher than Smith as a result.
Smith's away record is great. For someone rated as highly his him I find the home average of "only" 64 odd on primarily disgusting roads kind of underwhelming though. I know it sounds weird to criticise someone for averaging 64 but I'd have expected better from the best since Bradman at home given the state of the pitches.
Seems to be a trend a few people on here are saying, that Smith has batted on roads, which goes back to what I said about this era and the last 10 odd years that its easier to bad during this last ten to 12 years.Yeah they have been for the vast majority of their careers. I rate Cummins much higher than Smith as a result.
Smith's away record is great. For someone rated as highly his him I find the home average of "only" 60 odd on primarily disgusting roads kind of underwhelming though.
They played through 00s ffs. Wickets had never been flatterSeems to be a trend a few people on here are saying, that Smith has batted on roads, which goes back to what I said about this era and the last 10 odd years that its easier to bad during this last ten to 12 years.
I am sure the the likes of Ponting, Lara, Tendulkar etc would be doing the same as Smith is and their average would be near the 60s, maybe even at 60s.
Anyway, Smith will still be an all time great when he retires, where to rank him is difficult as there's been so many many wonderful batsman over the years.
Probably because its not up to the same extent people paint it to be. One summer I can think when Smith absolutely feasted on dead roads was 14/15 vs India (both Kohli and Smith made 4 tons each). Other real cash in summer was 17/18 Ashes but Melbourne aside, wickets were not as flat as the Indian series. Either way I still give a great value to those runs he made in both of the series because he was caring Aus batting alone and without his runs, they were losing the two biggest serieses Aus hasYeah they have been for the vast majority of their careers. I rate Cummins much higher than Smith as a result.
Smith's away record is great. For someone rated as highly his him I find the home average of "only" 64 odd on primarily disgusting roads kind of underwhelming though. I know it sounds weird to criticise someone for averaging 64 but I'd have expected better from the best since Bradman at home given the state of the pitches.
Smith has done a fair share of that too.Probably because its not up to the same extent people paint it to be. One summer I can think when Smith absolutely feasted on dead roads was 14/15 vs India (both Kohli and Smith made 4 tons each). Other real cash in summer was 17/18 Ashes but Melbourne aside, wickets were not as flat as the Indian series. Either way I still give a great value to those runs he made in both of the series because he was caring Aus batting alone and without his runs, they were losing the two biggest serieses Aus has
After those two summers, his next best summer (average wise) is this one. He averaged over 70 in both 15/16 and 16/17 but it was mostly as the supporting act for Warner, Voges etc. Look I get it why people looking in to this more than they would for others because there aren't a ****ing lot else to look at re Smith but him padding up stats at home is certainly not in the similar vein as Marnus/ Voges cashing in on NZ or WI
What I'm saying is that I would rate Smith's two biggest cash in Summers in Australia (vs India 14/15 and England 17/18) where he averaged 130 plus (I think) and vastly inflates his home average of 64 a lot higher than any of your typical Warner/ Marnus/ Voges cash in summers for reasons mentioned aboveSmith has done a fair share of that too.
Don't forget the 2016 series against Pakistan on the flattest tracks I can imagine when he averaged 110, or 2015 against WI when he averaged 214.What I'm saying is that I would rate Smith's two biggest cash in Summers in Australia (vs India 14/15 and England 17/18) where he averaged 130 plus (I think) and vastly inflates his home average of 64 a lot higher than any of your typical Warner/ Marnus/ Voges cash in summers for reasons mentioned above