Shaheen is a huge loss because he's the second best quick in Asia but I don't think Hamza or Naseem have disgraced themselves. They're good bowlers and on better decks would get some reward.
The ''real'' market, currently at stumps is: Pakistan 8.6 NZ 2.5, Draw 2.10.
I'm not sure it's wise for me to have a slightly more attractive way of losing my money tbh
Did he behave normally? Coz otherwise its very on brand for him.
You’ve gotta remember that Blundell didn’t have a huge body of work to fall back on when he took over from Watling. His turn as an opener had fizzled out, and he’d only played a couple tests as keeper prior to that. Then he was execrably bad in India and in the first test v Bangladesh. They brought Fletcher into the squad for that SA series and if Blundell had failed I think Fletcher might’ve gotten a start in the second test (he was having a great season for Canterbury at the time). Instead he scored a nice downhill 90 and has never looked back. Hats off.
Well gee whizz, don't bet then.
I do find it somewhat off-putting that way he's always talking about his latest bet/gain/loss.
Are you referring to me? I don’t normally share my bets at all, when I talk about the odds I’m intending for it to be context for my opinion.
I don't see how you got the impression I was talking about you from that context. RTB's comment was clearly directed at ashley bach, who is always talking about his latest flutters.
Cant blame him for misunderstanding when his chief selector told him to eat balls.
They probably haven't thought about it this deeply but if you accept that humans are extremely loss averse (not controversial at all) then to counteract this tendency you could bias your decisions towards aggression
King Ish, we're not worthy!