The result was fine, the performance wasn't, not an embarrassment, but a poor performance.It’s a lot like the 0-0 with Scotland at the euros, in that it’s a really good result for England that’ll be reported on like it’s an embarrassment.
I know I've said it before, but Foden for Sterling next time imo.Gareth really doesn't like Foden does he? seemed the obvious change, and pretty unlucky not to be starting, yet Mount carries on regardless.
This will happen to England at some point in every tournament regardless of who is in the team."The US is overwhelming England in midfield" is quite a turn of events given how credentialed the latter is in comparison
Yeah but that’s who you are under Southgate, when a stodgy 0-0 will do the job you’re not getting anything else.The result was fine, the performance wasn't, not an embarrassment, but a poor performance.
As I said 0-0 is fine, but TBH this performance deserved a loss, which would have been a problem. ho-hum hopefully it'll be more fun against the Taffs they need to attack.Yeah but that’s who you are under Southgate, when a stodgy 0-0 will do the job you’re not getting anything else.
From what I saw this was a somewhat fortunate 0-0 though, rather than a "this is boring but we're never conceding" 0-0Yeah but that’s who you are under Southgate, when a stodgy 0-0 will do the job you’re not getting anything else.
Did it really though? America gave up trying to win about an hour in.As I said 0-0 is fine, but TBH this performance deserved a loss, which would have been a problem. ho-hum hopefully it'll be more fun against the Taffs they need to attack.
Maybe. USA were definitely better but they didn’t really create anything second half. If they’d scored in the first half then maybe England would have woken up, but they never needed to.From what I saw this was a somewhat fortunate 0-0 though, rather than a "this is boring but we're never conceding" 0-0
And 1930 was the only occasion before then apparently; they beat Belgium 2-0.Apparently it's the first time the US have kept a clean sheet against European opposition at a World Cup since the 1-0 win in 1950.
Yeah it did, they had the clearest chances, the better game-plan, we should have been 1 or 2 nil down before that last third where I guess both teams settled.Did it really though? America gave up trying to win about an hour in.
Drawing with us was embarrassing.It’s a lot like the 0-0 with Scotland at the euros, in that it’s a really good result for England that’ll be reported on like it’s an embarrassment.
Don’t fully agree but not enough to debate it I guess. The key point is we need to **** walesYeah it did, they had the clearest chances, the better game-plan, we should have been 1 or 2 nil down before that last third where I guess both teams settled.