subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
I asked this in another thread. But interested to know who rates the highest.
You've been disqualified for rating Davidson over Akram and Lindwall.Yeah Rizwan is making it. I'd be tempted to include him already and I'm the Captain of the Longevity Squad.
I measure longevity in years rather than Tests which may put me at odds with my loyal subjects sometimes. I have Davo's longevity as about a year less than Marshall's - if the bloke's gonna average 20 doing that and have it standardised to 19 then yeah he can be top 10.You've been disqualified for rating Davidson over Akram and Lindwall.
Isn't it the opposite? Assuming there is a spare bowling slot after the big three of Imran, Wasim and Waqar.Yeah Rizwan is making it. I'd be tempted to include him already and I'm the Captain of the Longevity Squad.
I think they're cricketers of similar quality but I think Babar and Shaheen are much less likely to make it than Rizwan, and of the other two Babar is a better chance than Shaheen just because of the competition.
I was kind of assuming a specialist spinner and Mushtaq Mohammad but if Rizwan is going to exist then Mushtaq could be let go for another specialist quick I guess. Not sure four genuinely frontline quicks in a subcontinent ATG XI really feels right though, especially if two of them are left armers.Isn't it the opposite? Assuming there is a spare bowling slot after the big three of Imran, Wasim and Waqar.
Even overcoming Akhtar requires something special though.Isn't it the opposite? Assuming there is a spare bowling slot after the big three of Imran, Wasim and Waqar.
Shaheen already has 100 wickets @24 at 22 years old. Even if he gets injured, he has enough years to make it to 250 wickets and be ahead of the opposition.Even overcoming Akhtar requires something special though.
Babar more likely to make it.
Easier bowling era, harder batting era. Shoaib was gun.Shaheen already has 100 wickets @24 at 22 years old. Even if he gets injured, he has enough years to make it to 250 wickets and be ahead of the opposition.
Babar on current returns doesnt average 50 yet and would need to play another 60 tests to have a comparable record to Younis, Inzi and Miandad.
Depends if you think Rizwan can bat at no.6 and allow for 5 bowlers.I was kind of assuming a specialist spinner and Mushtaq Mohammad but if Rizwan is going to exist then Mushtaq could be let go for another specialist quick I guess. Not sure four genuinely frontline quicks in a subcontinent ATG XI really feels right though, especially if two of them are left armers.
I agree but Shoaib's sample size is only 178 wickets. I have always been hesitant to put him in an ATG XI for that reason.Easier bowling era, harder batting era. Shoaib was gun.
I rate Babar as more talented than InziI would be suprised if Babar doesn’t end up ahead of Inzamam tbh, but maybe I’m just underrating Inzamam.
Babar's Test career has not been that great as yet. It actually took him a whole to be useful - he was (rightly) continued to be picked on hope for ages - and he's one of the best in the world now but it's been a short period in reality. I think when we go back and look upon it all it'll seem like he should have achieved more.I would be suprised if Babar doesn’t end up ahead of Inzamam tbh, but maybe I’m just underrating Inzamam.
Yeah same, I just think it didn't work out for Babar enough early on to actually have a better career given he's 28 now.I rate Babar as more talented than Inzi