Waqar's 4 year peak in which he was great against WI and Australia is better than Croft's entire career, Botham's peak years as well as Kapil's best.
Frankly, Babar like Kohli, simply seems to me to be in a superior class of batsman than Inzi in terms of talent. 80 tests with a good record, especially in Aus and SA, would be enough for me to rate him ahead of Inzi.Regarding Babar i struggle to see how he gets in over Inzi, Miandad, YK unless you pick him as a 6th batsman.
He would most likely end up playing 80-90 tests at the maximum and needs a final career record in G. Chappell range to make a case to be in 3-4-5 slots.
Yes Shaheen to his credit has a decent learning curve. When he started apart from his physical attributes nothing really stood out unlike Amir 1.0 who screamed once in a generation prospect.He can be better than Waqar with the new ball though. And he is a great learner.
Post - peak Waqar still averaged 26.Not to mention Waqar in his decline was probably still better than Kapil for was for most of his career tbh. Botham after his peak was genuinely awful.
Looking forward to the Waqar vs Thakur debate next.Waqar is way ahead of Kapil
Performances at the Gabba is what counts ultimately.Looking forward to the Waqar vs Thakur debate next.
Sadly both Kohli and Babar have underachievedFrankly, Babar like Kohli, simply seems to me to be in a superior class of batsman than Inzi in terms of talent. 80 tests with a good record, especially in Aus and SA, would be enough for me to rate him ahead of Inzi.
Can't mention these two in the same sentence. Babar never even really got going in Tests. You could argue he still has time to kick on though.Sadly both Kohli and Babar have underachieved
Kohli got to a peak at least.Sadly both Kohli and Babar have underachieved
That include quality tours of England and SA.Have you seen any pacer playing 40-50 tests with 1 5-fers against non-minnows?
Waqar after injury
View attachment 44533