• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Top 20 greatest batsmen of all time

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Williamson
Crowe
Turner
Donnelly
Taylor
Dempster
Conway
Jones
(the exciting) Sutcliffe
Reid (JF)
Mitchell
Richardson
Wright
Ryder
Fleming
Watling
Latham
Coney
2 from McCullum/Astle/Nicholls/Blundell
Jeez there's some proper mediocrity in that list.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
And Lara has played the most flawless innings than the "top five"

Also Gavaskar > Sobers. Opener > No.6
Flawless innings doesnt mean flawless career.

Tendulkar, Sobers, Viv and Hobbs are the four with the least flawed overall records plus generally considered the best of their eras.
 

ZK$

U19 Cricketer
Flawless innings doesnt mean flawless career.

Tendulkar, Sobers, Viv and Hobbs are the four with the least flawed overall records plus generally considered the best of their eras.
Viv is closer to Lara than he is to the other three tbh.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
Yeah it's purely based on Test batting.

Headley and Hammond are too high on your list. Gavaskar and Lara too low.
Purely Tests:

1) Bradman
2) Tendulkar
3) Sobers
4) Hobbs
5) Smith
6) Richards
7) Hutton
8) Lara
9) Hammond
10) Headley
11) Gavaskar
12) Pollock
13) Chappell
14) Sutcliffe
15) Ponting
16) Trumper (probably a very romantic pick)
17) Weekes
18) Compton
19) Border
20) Kallis
21) Sangakkara
22) Walcott
23) Miandad
24) Waugh
25) Boycott
26) Dravid
27) Barrington
28) Harvey
29) Kohli
30) Root

That 23-27 area I change my mind on a lot. Had Barrington at the top of the group actually until recently.
 
Last edited:

halba

State Captain
this era? post 90s

1. Tendulkar
2. Brian Lara
3. Kumar Sangakarra
4. AB De Villiers
5. Jacques Kallis
6. Rahul Dravid (similar defensive to Kallis)
7. Ricky Ponting
8. Gilly- impact player(average not as high- keeping)
9 . Steve Tuggah Waugh


Im sure most will agree with the above- approximately.

****No steve smith, kohli, root - modern day flat tracks have padded their average and i dont rate them. The above managed high averages on some tough tracks, v some crazy bowling attacks, and were very very skillful.
 
Last edited:

Adorable Asshole

International Regular
this era? post 90s

1. Tendulkar
2. Brian Lara
3. Kumar Sangakarra
4. AB De Villiers
5. Jacques Kallis
6. Rahul Dravid (similar defensive to Kallis)
7. Ricky Ponting
8. Gilly- impact player(average not as high- keeping)
9 . Steve Tuggah Waugh


Im sure most will agree with the above- approximately.

****No steve smith, kohli, root - modern day flat tracks have padded their average and i dont rate them. The above managed high averages on some tough tracks, v some crazy bowling attacks, and were very very skillful.
lol apart from Lara, Tendulkar and Waugh, all of them played mostly on flattest tracks since WW2.

Smith played on far more tougher tracks then Ponting or Dravid.
 

Jack1

International Debutant
And Lara has played the most flawless innings than the "top five"

Also Gavaskar > Sobers. Opener > No.6
Sobers batted top 5 more than 6. Batting position is close to irrelevant anyway in Tests. Certain players do better in certain positions. Gavaskar would probably have averaged less in the middle order
 

rtramdas

U19 12th Man
My TOP 10( all formats combined) as of now

1. Bradman // though 1 format only , he was way ahead of his contemporaries
2. Viv Richards // such dominating brilliance in both formats and far ahead of his contemporaries in ODIs,
3. Sachin Tendulkar // most complete batsman , brilliant in both formats, uniform records in all countries he played in coping enormous pressure of expectations.
4. AB Devilliers // such uniform brilliant record in tests and a monster in ODIs
5. Brian Lara // compiling mammoth inns was his speciality which deserves huge weightage. Very good ODI player too.
6. Greg Chappel // another batsman with such uniform record in both formats. Though lacks a bit in longevity when pitted against eras, that was adequate for the era he played in .
7.Virat Kohli // all format giant. May retain his position or not depending on his career end records.
8. Ricky Ponting // brilliant record in both formats. Would have been higher but for his pretty average record in India
9. Steven Smith // monster in tests and a good player in ODIs.May retain his position or not depending on his career end records.
10. Sunil Gavaskar // monster in tests for the era he played in .Was good in ODIs too.
 

Adorable Asshole

International Regular
Sobers batted top 5 more than 6. Batting position is close to irrelevant anyway in Tests. Certain players do better in certain positions. Gavaskar would probably have averaged less in the middle order
Opening is objectively tougher, because u have to face the new ball with pacers at their fastest.
 

_00_deathscar

International Regular
****No steve smith, kohli, root - modern day flat tracks have padded their average and i dont rate them. The above managed high averages on some tough tracks, v some crazy bowling attacks, and were very very skillful.
You don’t actually follow any cricket do you?
 

Jack1

International Debutant
Opening is objectively tougher, because u have to face the new ball with pacers at their fastest.
Top level cricket is mysterious. Certain players like batting certain positions more. Don’t forget the bowlers need to get their eye in too at the start.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Opening is objectively tougher, because u have to face the new ball with pacers at their fastest.
Opening is objectively tougher but Sobers did objectively better and there was no doubt in any of the cricket fraternity's minds that he was the best of his time. Gavaskar would not be considered ahead of Viv.
 

Top