subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Get over yourself. Kapil averaged nearly 30, saying Harris is better than him is not crazy even if you disagree.Some of the dumbest **** I have ever heard.
Get over yourself. Kapil averaged nearly 30, saying Harris is better than him is not crazy even if you disagree.Some of the dumbest **** I have ever heard.
So, do you rate Ollie Robinson as a better bowler than James Anderson?Get over yourself. Kapil averaged nearly 30, saying Harris is better than him is not crazy even if you disagree.
Nope. But I do rate Anderson better than Kapil.So, do you rate Ollie Robinson as a better bowler than James Anderson?
So you just have a gripe on Indian greats then. And willing to bend stats ridiculously to prove your point. You are a troll.Nope. But I do rate Anderson better than Kapil.
8 Kiwis pretending Bond isn't a myth and TJB.My question is how did subshakerz get away with creating 9 multis to vote for Harris in the poll
I don’t know who either of these people areSo, do you rate Ollie Robinson as a better bowler than James Anderson?
Nah, I rave about Tendulkar and Gavaskar all the time. The former to me is the best since Bradman and the latter the best opener ever along with Hobbs.So you just have a gripe on Indian greats then. And willing to bend stats ridiculously to prove your point. You are a troll.
This thread is an insult to a legend of the gameLet this thread RIP. Neither parties are willing to concede.
What would be the point of any CC thread if we did that?Let this thread RIP. Neither parties are willing to concede.
I get your point but Kapil was a 9.5/10 bowler for longer periods than Harris as well tbf.Say Kapil was a 7/10 bowler for a long career
Harris was a 4/10 bowler for a while, then briefly a 9.5/10 bowler
Kapil was a 7/10 bowler for way longer than Harris was a 9.5/10 bowler, whatever judgements you want to make on that are valid afaic
His peak is as long as the others entire career. It’s really not that hard to understand lol.Yeah but you are comparing one's peak with another's entire career. Anyways, let's not get dragged into this old argument.
Imagine averaging 21 with the ball for nearly a decade and not being considered a world class bowler lol.Kapil, like Anderson, can play decades more than others but that won't make him break into the worldclass category.
Yea but Kambli and Axar are Indian so then subshakerz will think of something different.This thread is an insult to a legend of the game
Let's start comparing Victor Trumper to Vinod Kambli or Axar Patel to Saqlain Mushtaq next.
It would be a good start, yes.You want him to never post on cricket?
LolHarris is basically a glorified Lakmal that didn't play when he was meh.
I know Tendulkar debuted at 16, but have new-born babies played test cricket?So Harris had to wait for 30 years to debut .
Young Rashid Khan.I know Tendulkar debuted at 16, but have new-born babies played test cricket?