And Heather brings up that no warnings were given and says that the Indian side is lying to keep the drama going lolAlthough it would be funny if Dean does come out and say the contrary to keep this drama going
Why is the warning even a thing? You take a risk and are dismissed legally. End of story.And Heather brings up that no warnings were given and says that the Indian side is lying to keep the drama going lol
wotI get the feeling that mr mr has brown friends and is gonna bring them up soon.
That was also her point to be fair, a warning wasn’t needed and she agreed that it was a fair dismissal and victory for IndiaWhy is the warning even a thing? You take a risk and are dismissed legally. End of story.
It's essentially worrying over nothing. Not exactly sure how that really needed clarity.Because I couldn't speak that clearly and decisively if my life depended on it lol. But I wish half of twitter now could see that post.
Agreed, but when I'm watching sports it's so I can see athletes doing things at a high skill level or athletes ****ing up in hilarious ways, and despite what some have posted here I don't think Mankads are either of those. Would still allow them though.I see the no-skill thing trotted out all the time re Mankads, but like, earlier in the game Mandhana got out to one of the worst balls you'll ever see. like any sport, extremely skilled acts can go unrewarded in cricket and the luckiest dumb **** can change the game. so who gives a **** about 'skill'? that to me is irreverent here. a common dismissal in cricket are two batters getting themselves confused and the fielding side walking up to the stumps to run them out. there's no skill there, and if that had happened here all we'd be doing is laughing at the english batters.
This is not on dude, cmon.I get the feeling that mr mr has brown friends and is gonna bring them up soon.
Heather wasn’t even playing lol, tf does she knowAnd Heather brings up that no warnings were given and says that the Indian side is lying to keep the drama going lol
Watching Boobie bowl these days is like a throwback to that era... Vintage experienceIt's a well known CW fact that if you suggest anyone chucked their doosra, you were in favour of the Bengal famine.
I don't think anyone believes that, but using 'skill' as an argument against mankadding seems irrelevant. we're a sport that has overthrows off of deflections and leg-byes for skill errors which can end up being the difference between winning and losing. some keepers try to do the trick of holding onto the ball until a batter lifts their foot up for a spilt second to get the stumping. is that anymore or less skilful than mankaddinglol at claiming Mankads require skill
Mate I quit my 6th grade club team (tasker park) because the one way sledging and open hostility toward indian players onfield made me uncomfortable. I can probably find a quote of me discussing it right here on CWI get the feeling that mr mr has brown friends and is gonna bring them up soon.
Still remember Vaughn slagging off Ashwin after the Buttler runout in the IPL for weeks and then praising Foakes for doing this trick to an Irish batter in an ODI as presence of mindsome keepers try to do the trick of holding onto the ball until a batter lifts their foot up for a spilt second to get the stumping. is that anymore or less skilful than mankadding
Cricket is a game of batting, bowling & fieldingI don't think anyone believes that, but using 'skill' as an argument against mankadding seems irrelevant. we're a sport that has overthrows off of deflections and leg-byes for skill errors which can end up being the difference between winning and losing. some keepers try to do the trick of holding onto the ball until a batter lifts their foot up for a spilt second to get the stumping. is that anymore or less skilful than mankadding
Also the mythical spirit of the game. Isn't the stumping done only because it is felt the batsman has an undue advantage changing his position from the stance, so how do we explain this being in the spirit of the game then?I don't think anyone believes that, but using 'skill' as an argument against mankadding seems irrelevant. we're a sport that has overthrows off of deflections and leg-byes for skill errors which can end up being the difference between winning and losing. some keepers try to do the trick of holding onto the ball until a batter lifts their foot up for a spilt second to get the stumping. is that anymore or less skilful than mankadding
Vaughan's rule is simple. Say something edgy to get under people's skin, get some attention that he desperately needs/begs for. RINSE. REPEAT.Still remember Vaughn slagging off Ashwin after the Buttler runout in the IPL for weeks and then praising Foakes for doing this trick to an Irish batter in an ODI as presence of mind
Fair enough. That is my fault. Will delete the post. Apologies if I hurt you, honestly.Mate I quit my 6th grade club team (tasker park) because the one way sledging and open hostility toward indian players onfield made me uncomfortable. I can probably find a quote of me discussing it right here on CW
I hate sledging and I also hate mankadding. But mankadding is the current issue on my mind as this incident happened yesterday
I just want cricket that tastes like real cricket
It's all goodFair enough. That is my fault. Will delete the post. Apologies if I hurt you, honestly.
Still feel your views on the dismissal has been idiotic to say the least though.
Ridiculous levels of stretching here. No need to be this asinine about what's 'real cricket' and what isn't.Cricket is a game of batting, bowling & fielding
Mankads involve none of the above and in most instances, the ball isn’t even in play when attempted