• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who is the best limited over spinner of all time

Best limited over spinner/slow bowler of all time

  • Rashid Khan

  • Shane Warne

  • Muralidharan

  • Saqlain Mushtaq

  • Sachin Tendulkar

  • Any Other


Results are only viewable after voting.

Spark

Global Moderator
I fully appreciate and buy into the "WCs >>>>>>>> else" mentality when rating current ODI players, and basically all those after roughly the 2011 WC. I do not understand it at all for players in the 90s when non-WC ODIs were still serious, competitive international fixtures taken seriously by players, boards and public.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I fully appreciate and buy into the "WCs >>>>>>>> else" mentality when rating current ODI players, and basically all those after roughly the 2011 WC. I do not understand it at all for players in the 90s when non-WC ODIs were still serious, competitive international fixtures taken seriously by players, boards and public.
pre ~ 2005: WCs >>>>> else
post~2005: WCs >>>>>>>> else
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Fair enough, I forgot that one since all I remembered was him being decimated by Gilly in the final in that WC.

Still, do you think that is enough evidence that he is a big match player?

He played in three other WC finals and WC semis and you would expect some other major performances.
You're probably remembering all Gilchrist's other innings against SL cause he slapped Murali around plenty of other times but that wasn't one of them
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Gilchrist faced 20 balls from Murali and hit one boundary
Murali was 44 off 7 overs for no wickets in the final. Wow what a performance.

Anyways, you want to consider Murali a big match player, by all means. I think the evidence is that he more often fails to turn up.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
You're probably remembering all Gilchrist's other innings against SL cause he slapped Murali around plenty of other times but that wasn't one of them
I mean, I can be excused for not knowing the ball by ball, but I do remember Gilly smashing and Murali being wicketless and expensive.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
I fully appreciate and buy into the "WCs >>>>>>>> else" mentality when rating current ODI players, and basically all those after roughly the 2011 WC. I do not understand it at all for players in the 90s when non-WC ODIs were still serious, competitive international fixtures taken seriously by players, boards and public.
I agree somewhat. I am not saying ignore an overall career just in favor of WCs.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I fully appreciate and buy into the "WCs >>>>>>>> else" mentality when rating current ODI players, and basically all those after roughly the 2011 WC. I do not understand it at all for players in the 90s when non-WC ODIs were still serious, competitive international fixtures taken seriously by players, boards and public.
Yeah it's this for me too.

ODIs these days are so low intensity and so rarely against full strength sides that I just don't rate the quality, but I think there's a difference between that and just deciding to disregard entire bodies of work for a few games in such a high variance sport that already suffers from sample sizes too small because you want your players to be cLuTcH.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah it's this for me too.

ODIs these days are so low intensity and so rarely against full strength sides that I just don't rate the quality, but I think there's a difference between that and just deciding to disregard entire bodies of work for a few games in such a high variance sport that already suffers from sample sizes too small because you want your players to be cLuTcH.
I don't have a problem with posters putting Murali ahead of Warne because of his overall record because it is significantly better. In fact, to me, it is touch and go between them. But I think Warne's WC performances are definitely a point in his favor.
 

Jayro

U19 12th Man
For a spinner Pat Symcox was also very economical for his time although he always had huge bowling and fielding support with him.
 

Migara

International Coach
Fair enough, I forgot that one since all I remembered was him being decimated by Gilly in the final in that WC.

Still, do you think that is enough evidence that he is a big match player?

He played in three other WC finals and WC semis and you would expect some other major performances.
Hmm, easily forgets how Warne was manhandled by gurusinha and Ranatunga in WC final.
 

Bolo.

International Captain
I fully appreciate and buy into the "WCs >>>>>>>> else" mentality when rating current ODI players, and basically all those after roughly the 2011 WC. I do not understand it at all for players in the 90s when non-WC ODIs were still serious, competitive international fixtures taken seriously by players, boards and public.
Ya, Jamodis used to not be a real thing. ODIs counted. I actually used to think a random ODI bilateral counted nearly as much as tests. Clearly, you can dismiss this opinion (correctly) by calling me an idiot. Thing is though, my idiocy remains, but my opinion on Jamodis is well different.
 

Slifer

International Captain
Went with Saqlain. Imo, he did well enough vs the best players of spin (india) and the best team of his time Australia. Good enough for me
 

Top