• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Best team since Waugh/ Ponting’s Australia?

Best team?


  • Total voters
    84
Status
Not open for further replies.

Chrish

International Debutant
India probably would have won the game last time around had they decided not to leave; oh well karma and all. Serves us right. Any ways I am not upset about this loss. I would take 2-2 over past few debacles when visiting England anytime.

Loss in SA still hurts though.. like physically! This was the opportunity.
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I think Smiths SA side possibly wasn't as good as the Strauss England side but the SA team were better for longer so earn a few extra points for that and just shade it.
 

Chrish

International Debutant
I don’t.. In a 5 test series in india against this Indian side vs any other side from history, I would put my money on the former without a doubt..
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
You mean that same Strauss side that Smith's SA beat at home in 2012?
The England team from 2010 to the end of 2011 was the best England team I’ve ever seen. How we’d have fared that year V SA I don’t know but we were a poor imitation of ourselves a year later for reasons I can’t fully understand
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
SA were also quite clearly better in the drawn 09/10 series. IIRC England saved two games 9 down?

So the theory is that England’s peak, when they were better than SA at their best, just happened to perfectly bisect the times they faced SA. Sounds dumb af. I think it’s probably true though.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
SA were also quite clearly better in the drawn 09/10 series. IIRC England saved two games 9 down?

So the theory is that England’s peak, when they were better than SA at their best, just happened to perfectly bisect the times they faced SA. Sounds dumb af. I think it’s probably true though.
Bit of an aligning of the stars wasn’t it. Broad flying with bat and ball, Anderson sublime, Swann the best spinner in the world at the time. Bresnan/Tremlett both outstanding at first change. All of the top seven averaging 40+ at first, and then all bar Morgan when Colly retired. Cook and Bell in career best form.


You’re not wrong about the SA series but we did absolutely crush them in the game we won mind you.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
It's reasonable to say that the England side from 2009-2013 was arguably better than SA over those years but they happened to play all their best series against teams that weren't SA. It's not really that their peak was so short it was between the 2009-10 and the 2012 series, because in late 2012 they beat India in India, which was a huge achievement and only looks harder to replicate as time goes on.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's reasonable to say that the England side from 2009-2013 was arguably better than SA over those years but they happened to play all their best series against teams that weren't SA. It's not really that their peak was so short it was between the 2009-10 and the 2012 series, because in late 2012 they beat India in India, which was a huge achievement and only looks harder to replicate as time goes on.
England being better in 2009 is a very tough sell. In 2012 my read was that they were a bit past their best when they beat India away. Based on that doc that came out a while back I think the players felt the same way. Though it also suggested that Flower built that team on a cult-like intensity that couldn’t possibly be sustained.

I don’t remember SA ever feeling quite complete in the way that 2011 England did. SA always felt like they could beat anyone anywhere and lose to anyone anywhere. There were a lot of impressive series wins but not so many dominant ones.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
England being better in 2009 is a very tough sell. In 2012 my read was that they were a bit past their best when they beat India away. Based on that doc that came out a while back I think the players felt the same way. Though it also suggested that Flower built that team on a cult-like intensity that couldn’t possibly be sustained.

I don’t remember SA ever feeling quite complete in the way that 2011 England did. SA always felt like they could beat anyone anywhere and lose to anyone anywhere. There were a lot of impressive series wins but not so many dominant ones.
Yeah I don't really feel strongly about which of these teams was better, just saying that we ought not to just use the head-to-head series to decide which is a better side in general.
 

Slifer

International Captain
I don’t.. In a 5 test series in india against this Indian side vs any other side from history, I would put my money on the former without a doubt..
Agreed. But "smash" either one of Waugh's teams or Clive Lloyd’s? No. In any length test series I'd expect it to be an Indian win by a single test at most.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I think Smiths SA side possibly wasn't as good as the Strauss England side but the SA team were better for longer so earn a few extra points for that and just shade it.
The England team from 2010 to the end of 2011 was the best England team I’ve ever seen. How we’d have fared that year V SA I don’t know but we were a poor imitation of ourselves a year later for reasons I can’t fully understand
The mental gymnastics this must take wow.

"We were better than that team but then we lost to that team because we just weren't as good that year but the other years we were better"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top