• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia in Pakistan 2022

Spark

Global Moderator
Yeah and with how Australia have bowled in 4th innings recently you'd probably want 350 minimum. And even then I'd like more.
Yeah something like 350 in 110 overs would be the absolute outer limits of what I feel you'd be prepared to consider. Unless they completely collapse tomorrow morning, you'd think they'd look to be bowling about 40 minutes before stumps tomorrow with a high-300s lead.
 

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah something like 350 in 110 overs would be the absolute outer limits of what I feel you'd be prepared to consider. Unless they completely collapse tomorrow morning, you'd think they'd look to be bowling about 40 minutes before stumps tomorrow with a high-300s lead.
You'd imagine they'd reach a 350 lead within 80 overs
 

Spark

Global Moderator
You'd imagine they'd reach a 350 lead within 80 overs
230 in 80 overs isn't that easy to achieve on this deck. Both sides have struggled to maintain 3rpo.

Not to mention, you still have to actually bat properly to bat that long.
 

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
230 in 80 overs isn't that easy to achieve on this deck. Both sides have struggled to maintain 3rpo
It isn't but Australia should look to put the foot down fairly aggressively after lunch tomorrow with wickets in hand
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Imagine the match with more grass. You'd have Starc + Cummins vs. Naseem + Shaheen basically destroying the respective lineups for under 200.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Imagine the match with more grass. You'd have Starc + Cummins vs. Naseem + Shaheen basically destroying the respective lineups for under 200.
Alternatively, the match with more grass makes the pitch incredibly even-paced and batting-friendly...
 

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
230 in 80 overs isn't that easy to achieve on this deck. Both sides have struggled to maintain 3rpo.

Not to mention, you still have to actually bat properly to bat that long.
Plus Smith scores like at a snail pace now
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Pakistan's pace attack lacks the killer instinct needed in this situation. Afridi can't dry up runs at the best of times. After the opening bowlers, there's Hasan Ali and 2 spinners who exceed Lyon in terms of ineffectiveness.
 

Top