Cartwright is a waste of spaceThink we’ve got the all rounder thing covered with Green, and guys like Marsh, Cartwright and Stoinis hanging around if need be.
Our glaring weakness is class opening bats
Cartwright is a waste of spaceThink we’ve got the all rounder thing covered with Green, and guys like Marsh, Cartwright and Stoinis hanging around if need be.
Our glaring weakness is class opening bats
He would walk in over Martyn,Katich who played in that time.Even with Clarke and Hussey?
One kind Australia doesn't produce enough is all-rounders. Try Ben Stokes, will fit right in
Always had one passenger in their side: Kasprowicz, Bickle, Brad Hogg etc.Yeah Australia was a pretty faultless team in that period but there were still plenty of players around at the time who could get into and improve them even more
Hardly passengers in that when selected they always did what was requiredAlways had one passenger in their side: Kasprowicz, Bickle, Brad Hogg etc.
It’s an obvious choice.For India? Why? Unless you mean for Singapore.
For past Indian teams, a world class pace bowler would be much better. But if you mean for current Indian team, Kallis is a great choice. Would allow us to play 6 batsmen.It’s an obvious choice.
Only a marginally worse batsmen than the best options available, perfect 5th bowler and a pretty good slip fielder.
Yeah current team definitely.For past Indian teams, a world class pace bowler would be much better. But if you mean for current Indian team, Kallis is a great choice. Would allow us to play 6 batsmen.
Batting is more of recent issue. I would say a gap in Kohli's side is that the lower order tends to fold very quickly and the spinner allrounders mostly fetch you soft runs.Yeah current team definitely.
Kapil/Imran would be amazing for the current side too but we already have good bowlers - our batting seems to be the biggest problem now. With Kallis as you say we can fix that plus play 6 batsmen + Pant, one spin bowler who can bat and our 3 fast bunnies (or swap one out for Lord if needed).
Few things wrong with this. Firstly they definitely didn't always have one of these lesser players in the side, secondly they generally performed very well when given the chance.Always had one passenger in their side: Kasprowicz, Bickle, Brad Hogg etc.
And without Kasprowicz, 1998 BG Trophy would have been 3-0 and I dont think you would have won the tests you did in 2004 either.Few things wrong with this. Firstly they definitely didn't always have one of these lesser players in the side, secondly they generally performed very well when given the chance.
Brad Hogg a particularly weird one to name given he was about as good (IMO better) than Warne was in ODIs and one of the best white-ball spinners in the world during his time was well as a good lower-order bat and exceptional fielder. Wouldn't replace him with anyone.
I didn't play Test cricket in 2004I dont think you would have won the tests you did in 2004 either.
Wish you had. Aussie cricketers are well paid.I didn't play Test cricket in 2004
Now what horseshit is this? Do you even watch India games?Batting is more of recent issue. I would say a gap in Kohli's side is that the lower order tends to fold very quickly and the spinner allrounders mostly fetch you soft runs.
Yea for some reason thought you mean the 90s/00s team in which case Kallis would be a bizarre choice. He'd be a great choice for this current team for sure with his all round abilities.Yeah current team definitely.
Kapil/Imran would be amazing for the current side too but we already have good bowlers - our batting seems to be the biggest problem now. With Kallis as you say we can fix that plus play 6 batsmen + Pant, one spin bowler who can bat and our 3 fast bunnies (or swap one out for Lord if needed).