Don't know that Canterbury's bowling had any alphas and they still absolutely dominated the match. If the question is why didn't Wellington do the same on a wicket with seam movement, while fielding five seamers, then the first one I'm looking at is the clear leader of this attack in Iain McPeake. By far the most experienced but took 0/66 and 0/39.Wellington also missing the hard edge brought by the alphas Bennett and van Beek. Without them all they've got are a collection of good club bowlers, a promising youngster in Smith, and 4 overs of hellfire followed by rapidly diminishing returns once the ramen and energy drink that fuels Sears' spindly frame is burnt out.
"Corridor of Uncertainty Over Whether This Guy Should Keep Bowling"
That sort of trash seen above is just a reflection of how little cachet being a longer-format pro cricketer actually has now, I suppose. All of the Adam Leonards trying for low 140s pace and to maybe make something of themselves in Firebirds T20, all of the reasonably young and lively Wellingtonians are actively pushing this burly everyman McPeake forward to the front of the stage, until late November.
No Alpha but Sheat and Williams are absolute wicket taking machines. Add to that Henry and you have probably the best attack suited for Basin and Hagley Oval. Maybe not so much on other decks but they play fair number of games on these.Don't know that Canterbury's bowling had any alphas and they still absolutely dominated the match. If the question is why didn't Wellington do the same on a wicket with seam movement, while fielding five seamers, then the first one I'm looking at is the clear leader of this attack in Iain McPeake. By far the most experienced but took 0/66 and 0/39.