• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Building a 'Peak XI'

subshakerz

International Coach
One of the drawbacks when picking an ATG is that each cricketer normally has a period of their career when they dipped, and when you end up picking it is hard to tell which phase of their career you are picking them based on, or the sum of their career in general.

In this exercise, rather than select them based on being ATGs, we select an XI based on those who scaled the highest of peak performances in cricket, with a minimum cut off period of 33 tests (based on the article: https://www.thecricketmonthly.com/story/1057899/the-best-stats-measure).

In essence, you are not selecting them on career but on the best level of cricket achieved (also looking at conditions), and this XI would be the highest performing one possible to face off against a Martian XI.

The only exceptions here are Barnes and Bradman, whose entire careers were peaks basically.

To begin, here is my XI:

Hayden (2001 - 2004)
Graham Gooch (1990 - 1994)
Viv Richards (1976 - 1980/1)
Tendulkar (1997 - 2001/2)
Steve Waugh (1993 - 1997/8)
Sobers (1961 - 68)
Gilchrist (1999 - 2003)
Botham (1977 - 81)
Imran (1982 - 86/7)
Marshall (1984 - 88)
Murali (2003 - 2006)
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
May be relevant in this thread:

Painstakingly calculated peak 10 calendar year bowling averages for best bowlers of last 50 odd years.

Bowler10 yearsMatWktsWPMAvg
Imran1979-1988552584.6918.74
Hadlee1979-1988543025.5919.27
Murali1998-2007845887.0019.62
Marshall1981-1990603045.0719.66
Ambrose1990-1999713094.3520.14
McGrath1995-2004974584.7220.47
Akram1988-1997552694.8921.13
Steyn2007-2016763855.0721.18
Waqar1989-1998552755.0021.57
Donald1992-2001703284.6921.77
Pollock1995-2004893614.0621.88
Lillee1972-1981563075.4822.79
Walsh1992-2001823454.2124.19
Warne1993-20021024794.7025.30

Edit: Added Pollock
 

CricAddict

Cricketer Of The Year
Being very good batsmen and also topping these bowling charts, Imran and Hadlee are unbelievable. They should seriously be the first names on the sheet in the ATG XI.
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
Donald is same age as Akram. Akram's peak started 4 years before Donald could debut. So we probably missed out on roughly4 years of Donald's peak probably.
 

Teja.

Global Moderator
May be relevant in this thread:
Imran was missing 2+ years due to injury in those 10 years so didn't have to play as much as the others. So it isn't as much of a '10 year peak' as some of the other bowlers in the list.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Imran was missing 2+ years due to injury in those 10 years so didn't have to play as much as the others. So it isn't as much of a '10 year peak' as some of the other bowlers in the list.
Surely most fast bowler would have upwards of an year on the sidelines in any ten year period. Even McGrath was out for a while after that ankle injury.
 

Teja.

Global Moderator
Donald is same age as Akram. Akram's peak started 4 years before Donald could debut. So we probably missed out on roughly4 years of Donald's peak probably.
Wasim had a very ordinary 1987-1990 period. In 1988 and 1989 combined, he took 29 wickets @ 30. His extended 'peak' started in 1990, 2 years before Donald's debut and not 1988.
 

Teja.

Global Moderator
Surely most fast bowler would have upwards of an year on the sidelines in any ten year period. Even McGrath was out for a while after that ankle injury.
Imran played slightly less than 2/3rd (55/83) of Pakistan's tests in that period. Missing a test for every two you play in a peak decade is a pretty huge variation from most of the other players in the list and is very notable IMO.

The average ATG fast bowler plays around 85% of the tests in their prime decade while guys like Hadlee and Walsh in that list played over 90% of the tests in the years mentioned. Even McGrath and Steyn played 83-84% of their tests despite those notorious injuries, for example.

If I have to pick someone as a pure pace bowler in a team to play for an entire decade, I think it's better to pick someone like Hadlee who will play nearly every test as opposed to Imran who won't be there a third of the time.

Only Lillee fares worse than Imran in the department of tests missed with pretty much everyone else a few miles ahead.
 

Teja.

Global Moderator
The biggest weakness with peak-based methodology is cricketers who either have multiple peaks and troughs or who do not follow standard patterns for peaks and valleys but have great years interspersed with poor or average years in a somewhat random pattern.

As an example of the first, Lara's twin peaks from 1993-1995 and 2003-2005 totalling a period of six years and 58 tests:

1634709293283.png

His career in the remaining 9-10 years:

1634709532087.png
 

subshakerz

International Coach
Imran was missing 2+ years due to injury in those 10 years so didn't have to play as much as the others. So it isn't as much of a '10 year peak' as some of the other bowlers in the list.
In the graph, it shows that Imran played pretty much the same number of tests as Hadlee, Lillee, Wasim and Waqar in those ten years.
 

Teja.

Global Moderator
In the graph, it shows that Imran played pretty much the same number of tests as Hadlee, Lillee, Wasim and Waqar in those ten years.
He played 2/3rd of this allotted tests. Lillee played less than 60%. Wasim and Waqar played 75%-80%. The majority of ATG fast bowlers played 85%+ of tests in their peak decades which is 20%-30% more than Imran.

It's not useful to say Imran played as much as Hadlee because he missed a lot more. Absolute tests played cannot be used to absolve Imran as in absolute tests terms, McGrath played close to twice as many in a decade. The percentage of tests played is a more useful measure.
 

subshakerz

International Coach
The biggest weakness with peak-based methodology is cricketers who either have multiple peaks and troughs or who do not follow standard patterns for peaks and valleys but have great years interspersed with poor or average years in a somewhat random pattern.

As an example of the first, Lara's twin peaks from 1993-1995 and 2003-2005 totalling a period of six years and 58 tests:

View attachment 29636

His career in the remaining 9-10 years:

View attachment 29638
Having great years with poor years is by definition not a peak. A peak is a sustained period.

And having multiple peaks doesnt mean all peak are equal. Tendulkar's peak of 1997-2002 is superior to his second peak of 2007-2011 given the bowling quality of the former.
 

Teja.

Global Moderator
Having great years with poor years is by definition not a peak. A peak is a sustained period.

And having multiple peaks doesnt mean all peak are equal. Tendulkar's peak of 1997-2002 is superior to his second peak of 2007-2011 given the bowling quality of the former.
Yes, my point is that peaks can be a very limited way of measuring actual comparative quality of cricketers due to careers not following strict patterns wherein a cricketer's best cricket comes in one extended unbroken chain. Unbroken peaks as an interesting exercise within cricket discussion is obviously still fine.
 

subshakerz

International Coach
Imran played slightly less than 2/3rd (55/83) of Pakistan's tests in that period. Missing a test for every two you play in a peak decade is a pretty huge variation from most of the other players in the list and is very notable IMO.

The average ATG fast bowler plays around 85% of the tests in their prime decade while guys like Hadlee and Walsh in that list played over 90% of the tests in the years mentioned. Even McGrath and Steyn played 83-84% of their tests despite those notorious injuries, for example.

If I have to pick someone as a pure pace bowler in a team to play for an entire decade, I think it's better to pick someone like Hadlee who will play nearly every test as opposed to Imran who won't be there a third of the time.

Only Lillee fares worse than Imran in the department of tests missed with pretty much everyone else a few miles ahead.
Imran was a fairly fit bowler in normal circumstances, his shin injury was an unusually bad one that stopped him from bowling for two years.

I am genuinely curious how Imran missed out 28 tests in that period, even with his two year absence.
 

Top