Martin Crowe had some
'interesting' comments' in the early 00s re: cricketing genetics within NZ saying that Maoris generally can't hack international cricket due to their lack of perseverance and inability to concentrate for a full day, let alone a test match.
Thankfully, many other NZ cricketers disagreed with him and said it's nothing to do with genetics and more due to the fact that cricket is a middle class sport and that the main reason it hadn't gripped the Maori is financial barriers/inequities at the grass-root level, the high cost of gear and registration as well as the long distances which have to be travelled for club games. He apologised subsequently.
The same argument has been going on in South Africa about the under representation of black cricketers in the SA side being due to the financial inequities faced by the black population and not because 'cricket is not a black man's game' as previously believed.
You'd think the thoughtful POV would be that financial arguments for those populations would apply even moreso to the populations of the Asian countries ravaged by colonialism wherein 90+% of the population makes less than 5$ a day but the cost of a decent level of cricket remains almost the same as the first world.
But hey, what do I know, maybe the Crowe POV is correct, inherent genetic factors dominate and asians are only decent at cricket due to the hordes of us playing it.