• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

2nd greatest living cricketer

Who is the 2nd greatest living cricketer (behind Sobers)?


  • Total voters
    74

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Nah, from what I know of Cw when a former cricketer posts here, we're skeptical of their tall claims, and proceed to be be dicks to them until they no longer post here. Small sample size but that's how it usually goes.
JBMAC is made of sterner stuff IMO
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Much respect for JBMAC's opinion as always, though I would surprise the whole of the forum and personally vote for another Australian left handed batsman, TOTAB.
 

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
Hadlee, proctor and Miller arguably better than Imran.

McGrath arguably inferior to Akram, Marshall, Hadlee, Lillee, Steyn, Trueman.. Etc
Christ, give it a rest.

Procter was great but largely untested in tests.

Miller was “arguably” better than Imran but they played different roles. Miller bowled short sharp spells supported by 4 other bowlers while Imran was proper frontline.

McGrath isn’t “arguably” worse than any of the quicks you mentioned bar Mako who I consider him on par with.

Anyway, you’re arguing against your dumb original point which was McGrath or Imran are “overrated”. If you’re undisputedly in the top 1 or 2 of all time in your main discipline/role, you can hardly be “overrated”.
 

Gob

International Coach
Christ, give it a rest.

Procter was great but largely untested in tests.

Miller was “arguably” better than Imran but they played different roles. Miller bowled short sharp spells supported by 4 other bowlers while Imran was proper frontline.

McGrath isn’t “arguably” worse than any of the quicks you mentioned bar Mako who I consider him on par with.

Anyway, you’re arguing against your dumb original point which was McGrath or Imran are “overrated”. If you’re undisputedly in the top 1 or 2 of all time in your main discipline/role, you can hardly be “overrated”.
I consider McGrath to be number 2 personally but I could live with people preferring Ambrose, Hadlee, Steyn and I know it's a hate crime here but Lillee ahead of him. Different people give different weights to different aspects and you can argue Ambrose bowled more killer spells, Hadlee carried his team more and Steyn could take the pitch out of the equation like no other. You also have to admire Lillee for coming back as a totally different bowler after all the injuries to be as effective as before.

Overall there isn't much among those guys. Marshall and McGrath tick more boxes
 

CodeOfWisden

U19 Cricketer
5. Shane Warne (basically as good as Murali v. top 8 nations, can actually hold a bat, great slip fielder. Also, people don't really understand the flexibility and balance that an ATG leg spinner can give to a bowling attack. Turned matches on a dime, haterz can suck it)
6. Muttaih Muralitharan (the best specialist bowler)
If you do not consider Murali a chucker than there is no way that Warne is ahead of him.
Especially if you are considering both formats.
Murali is Mohammad Ali, Warne is Mike Tyson.
Murali has proved his superiority quite a few times, if we also consider the fact that he had no support there's no way that Warne can be rated higher.
 

Top