I think either of Rohit and dhawan would work better with a Gilchrist type aggressive opener than they did with each other. Some quick starts would've been great for us in 2015 and 2019.2011 WC Indian side the only one I can think of, maybe during the peak Dhawan - Rohit times and the 2019 cup English side as well.
Maybe, maybe not - but there's a chance Gilly might not make that side as a pure opener.I think either of Rohit and dhawan would work better with a Gilchrist type aggressive opener than they did with each other. Some quick starts would've been great for us in 2015 and 2019.
Better than comparing ODI averages across eras for the same position tbf.Also if people try to compare ODI averages across eras between completely different positions I will get mad.
Considering India lost total 3 matches in 2 ODI WC , 2 of them in SF , One was against Enģ, I don't think this statement to be true.I think either of Rohit and dhawan would work better with a Gilchrist type aggressive opener than they did with each other. Some quick starts would've been great for us in 2015 and 2019.
Don't really care about batting averages to that extent when what I was talking about was getting quick starts. Its something that has held indias scores in odis back quite a bit.Considering India lost total 3 matches in 2 ODI WC , 2 of them in SF , One was against Enģ, I don't think this statement to be true.
Have you even checked batting average of Dhawan, Sharma in ODI WC ?
In ODIs openers tend to average more than late orderAlso if people try to compare ODI averages across eras between completely different positions I will get mad. All ODI stats are meaningless ofc but those sorts of comparisons are especially spurious
Hey fine if you don't think Gilchrist was a great odi player but the idea that were trying to give him that status retroactively is complete absurdity. He was always considered a great of the format. There is no retroactive reappraisal of his career here.. But constructing strawman arguments that retroactively makes Gilchrist some kind of ODI great is just
I would've been less confident about Matt Henry destroying India's top order in the 2019 semifinal if Gilchrist had been opening for them.Considering India lost total 3 matches in 2 ODI WC , 2 of them in SF , One was against Enģ, I don't think this statement to be true.
Have you even checked batting average of Dhawan, Sharma in ODI WC ?
I love AB but would never pick him as a keeper in an ODI team (amazing fielder and passable 6th/7th bowler). Likewise Sanga is my favourite non-NZ player, but Gilchrist was a much better ODI batsman.Gilchrist will not make a lot of sides as a pure opener. As a keeper-batsman who opens, he still wont be picked ahead of MSD or ABD or even Sangakkara. A lot of mental gymnastics going around here by some just to double down on a bad take.
Like I said earlier, its fine if u rate Tests as a higher format and therefore wanna choose Gilly. But constructing strawman arguments that retroactively makes Gilchrist some kind of ODI great is just
And there is the small point that a great side will need a player like Gilly to reach even greater status but for a poor side, a player like MSD may actually be more valuable given he has shown he can construct a competitive and good side from scratch across all 3 formats as a captain, while still contributing heavily enough to be a key player within that side.
There was a very brief period around 2001 when he, M.Waugh and Hayden rotated through the position and potentially he might have missed out in an alternate reality where he didn't keep. That didn't last long before Waugh was ****ed off thoughWhich real, historical sides wouldn't Gilchrist have made as opener only?