195 wickets, 5 centuries, yet averaged 36 with the ball and 28 with the bat.
Must be close right?
I was going to say this but Shastri was a pretty high quality cricketer who would add value to most teams in history tbh. Feels harsh to call him a no rounder. He was more of a utility cricketer who could average 35-40 batting anywhere from 1-7 with the bat and also be a consistent holding spinner/fifth bowler.Ravi Shastri ?
Nicky Boje and Pat Symcox would be worthy challengers.If by no-rounder we mean someone who was ostensibly an all-rounder but didn't provide enough of either discipline to justify it, then Derek Pringle takes some beating.
Ha, I didn't realise Boje had played as many as 43 Tests!Nicky Boje and Pat Symcox would be worthy challengers.
Pringle hardly even qualifies, considering he only averaged 15 with the bat. Never realised his record was so bad, only one fifty in thirty tests.If by no-rounder we mean someone who was ostensibly an all-rounder but didn't provide enough of either discipline to justify it, then Derek Pringle takes some beating.
Yeah, it's genuinely awful. A nominal Test all-rounder who was (at best) a barely middling bowler and effectively a tailender with the bat.Pringle hardly even qualifies, considering he only averaged 15 with the bat. Never realised his record was so bad, only one fifty in thirty tests.
The most amazing thing was the way they managed to spread his career fairly evenly over ten years. One of those 'oh we've got a spot to fill' picks.Yeah, it's genuinely awful. A nominal Test all-rounder who was (at best) a barely middling bowler and effectively a tailender with the bat.