• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Establishing the best decade for cricket: Finding the ATG XI from 12 decades of test cricket - then having a KO tourney to decide the best

h_hurricane

International Vice-Captain
Border has a better bowling average than Qadir in all of Australia, India, West Indies, Sri Lanka and New Zealand btw.:-O
 

Slifer

International Captain
Reminds me of the time someone tried to big up Roger Harper because he has a lower average than Lance Gibbs.
Apples and oranges. Qadir and Qasim were literally contemporaries and Qasim did better by any metric. One played 67 tests, the other 50. One averaged 32 the other 28. One averaged 48 outside Pakistan, the other 33. I won't begin to understand why Pakistan favored Qadir over Qasim generally.
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Apples and oranges. Qadir and Qasim were literally contemporaries and Qasim did better by any metric. One played 67 tests, the other 50. One averaged 32 the other 28. One averaged 48 outside Pakistan, the other 33. I won't begin to understand why Pakistan favored Qadir over Qasim generally.
Hey man, the umpires were too stupid to give him his flipper lbw wickets

@cnerd123
 
Last edited:

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
Apples and oranges. Qadir and Qasim were literally contemporaries and Qasim did better by any metric. One played 67 tests, the other 50. One averaged 32 the other 28. One averaged 48 outside Pakistan, the other 33. I won't begin to understand why Pakistan favored Qadir over Qasim generally.
I wasn’t talking about Qasim at all. I was referring to the use of Border’s meagre output to ridicule Qadir.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
Seriously, despite all the mystery surrounding abdul qadir, he wasn't that great. He was always bigged up by Imran as a psychological ploy against the opposition but he really wasn't quite as effective outside pakistan as Iqbal Qasim. And Iqbal Qasim was instrumental in Pak winning in India in the 1987 series along with tauseef ahmed.
 

h_hurricane

International Vice-Captain
I wasn’t talking about Qasim at all. I was referring to the use of Border’s meagre output to ridicule Qadir.
I wasn't ridiculing him. Was just pointing out that even a part timer averaged better than him in 5 countries which is not an anomaly. Qadir only took 48 more wickets than Border overseas btw. They both had meagre output abroad.
 

Coronis

International Coach
I just think in this context, a spinner is more likely to win the team a match than Kapil. Sounds strange to even say that tbh. Obviously his batting is far superior but this team has a lot of great batsmen already. But if we’re playing on a turner, I want a full time spinner available in my side. Kapil’s bowling will be unlikely to have as much of an impact here either, if blokes on the other ATG teams have outlasted a barrage from Marshall, Hadlee, Imran and Garner who is more likely to take a wicket? An inferior bowler of the same type or a completely different type of bowler?
 

Top