Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Thanks Warney.Well, given how well I seem to call these things
Thanks Warney.Well, given how well I seem to call these things
Dont bat on, PEWS.. DECLARE!!!!!!!!Thanks Warney.
in his last 30 tests when he started batting properly*only 13 not outs in 51 test innings tbf
Long-term injury recovery means he's not yet ready to bowl in a Test match.I see he's not in the touring squad, but is Hardik Pandya still a thing?
And if not, why not?
His seam is a steep downgrade on the the four incumbents', but he would be a serviceable fourth seam up option if Kohli is minded to insist on four and his extra batting would mean Ashwin could be swapped in for Jadeja.
Can’t bowl at the momentI see he's not in the touring squad, but is Hardik Pandya still a thing?
And if not, why not?
His seam is a steep downgrade on the the four incumbents', but he would be a serviceable fourth seam up option if Kohli is minded to insist on four and his extra batting would mean Ashwin could be swapped in for Jadeja.
haha - suck **** - you guys are going to get langer when Australia finally boots him.Well, given how well I seem to call these things, its time to get Simon Katich to replace Bewda post WT20.
The numbers are what they are but I think he's been looking technically proficient. This is why I think he deserves the promotion.Averages more than Rahane in the last X years because he bats with the tail.
Scored a brisk 48, took 5/95 first innings and 5/76 second inningsHow does Jadeja go in Duleep Trophy? Anyone who can hold a stick can score runs in Ranji.
Also while trawling I noticed Steven Finn is only 32. There's loads of dudes just meandering around County Cricket who I thought retired decades ago. James Hildreth, former test prospect, still exists with his massive FC batting average.
Seven or eight to three at test level is like playing two different sports though. The bloke is rolled gold where you’ve got him. Surely the answer is to play an extra batsman and only three quicks?The numbers are what they are but I think he's been looking technically proficient. This is why I think he deserves the promotion.
Yes - three is ridiculous. But I think five or six would work well - Ashwin at eight and three pacers.Seven or eight to three at test level is like playing two different sports though. The bloke is rolled gold where you’ve got him. Surely the answer is to play an extra batsman and only three quicks?
Games like this really reassert that a lot of the bowling prospects in Indian domestic cricket are nowhere near Test standard.Scored a brisk 48, took 5/95 first innings and 5/76 second innings
IND-B vs IND-R Cricket Scorecard, Final at Greater Noida, September 10 - 14, 2016
Live Cricket Scoreboard: Get India Blue vs India Red Final, cricket scorecard, Duleep Trophy 2016 dated September 10 - 14, 2016.www.espncricinfo.com
D’you reckon Ashwin is a big upgrade on Jadeja as a bowler? I don’t think there’s much between them these days.I see he's not in the touring squad, but is Hardik Pandya still a thing?
And if not, why not?
His seam is a steep downgrade on the the four incumbents', but he would be a serviceable fourth seam up option if Kohli is minded to insist on four and his extra batting would mean Ashwin could be swapped in for Jadeja.
I kinda think England would be very happy to see Ishant or Shami drop out for a debutant Indian batsman who nobody seems massively convinced by. Maybe in the long term they need to find another batsman from somewhere and the sooner they start trying to balance the side the better. But the immediate effect will be a big ****-off drop in raw cricketing quality so I can see why they’d put it off.Seven or eight to three at test level is like playing two different sports though. The bloke is rolled gold where you’ve got him. Surely the answer is to play an extra batsman and only three quicks?
I understand Kohli doesn’t want to do this, but I’m talking about what is actually for the best for the team? I don’t get the five bowler obsession. These aren’ttaxing conditions. It’s England. 15 Celsius and people take their shirts off. Four bowlers is enough, especially against the England batting side.
Massive difference between their bowling, at the moment. Jadeja looks like a part-timer in England. Ash has been quality for a while and has lots of experience in England.D’you reckon Ashwin is a big upgrade on Jadeja as a bowler? I don’t think there’s much between them these days.
Yeah people are way overthinking it. India's issue just isn't really a selection one, it's that they have a world class middle order going nowhere. All of them have made multiple matchwinning hundreds overseas, Rahul and Pant too. The moment they get their **** together the lineup will look fine.I kinda think England would be very happy to see Ishant or Shami drop out for a debutant Indian batsman who nobody seems massively convinced by. Maybe in the long term they need to find another batsman from somewhere and the sooner they start trying to balance the side the better. But the immediate effect will be a big ****-off drop in raw cricketing quality so I can see why they’d put it off.
I know nothing about the alternatives so I don’t have a strong opinion, but that’s how it looks to me too. Rahane, meh, maybe there isn’t much in it between him and the next guy. But Pujara is confirmed quality and I’d back him to come good again before I’d back someone else to come good for the first time. Kohli even more so obviously.Yeah people are way overthinking it. India's issue just isn't really a selection one, it's that they have a world class middle order going nowhere. All of them have made multiple matchwinning hundreds overseas, Rahul and Pant too. The moment they get their **** together the lineup will look fine.
He's not been disastrous but he's generally looked very iffy when England have bowled well. It'd be unfair to disregard his 91 entirely but he got some very very generous bowling early in his innings which you can't bank on again.Also I feel like Pujara isn’t even having a bad series? Only out once at TB and made perfectly respectable contributions here and at Lord’s.