• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who was the better bowler: Glenn Mcgrath or Wasim Akram?

Who was the better bowler: Glenn Mcgrath or Wasim Akram?


  • Total voters
    73
  • Poll closed .

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
McGrath and Marshall are ever so slightly ahead of the ATG pacers, IMO. Both succeeded everywhere against everyone.

Lillee, Ambrose, Wasim, Steyn, Hadlee, Imran, Garner all pretty close but if I was picking in the schoolyard I’d want MM and McGrath sharing the new ball.
 

_00_deathscar

International Regular
McGrath and Marshall are ever so slightly ahead of the ATG pacers, IMO. Both succeeded everywhere against everyone.

Lillee, Ambrose, Wasim, Steyn, Hadlee, Imran, Garner all pretty close but if I was picking in the schoolyard I’d want MM and McGrath sharing the new ball.
But again, doesn't that speak slightly towards them just being part of the best teams?
Yes them being that good is also WHY their teams were so good, but their teams were also very good outside of those players.
 

bagapath

International Captain
these kind of arguments will go on till the world ends; with mcgrath comfortably winning the battle for tests and akram marginally for ODIs.

On the day the world ends, when all arguments have to be locked forever, Sir Richard Hadlee is likely to go down in eternity as the greatest fast bowler of all time, all things considered.
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
these kind of arguments will go on till the world ends; with mcgrath comfortably winning the battle for tests and akram marginally for ODIs.

On the day the world ends, when all arguments have to be locked forever, Sir Richard Hadlee is likely to go down in eternity as the greatest fast bowler of all time, all things considered.
I take it you're not optimistic of the planet lasting much longer.
 

Engle

State Vice-Captain
Fast bowlers don’t just take wickets in a bubble. It’s not merely about the technical skills of inswing, outswing, averages and strike rates…

They also provide the firepower factor. Lifting the troops, demonstrating grit, aggro. Demoralizing the opposition, deterring them from taking liberties.

Mentoring junior fasties and lifting their game, forming effective partnerships.

The fast bowlers have the most permeating affect on the team, more so than the other positions (barring the captain of course)
 

bagapath

International Captain
I take it you're not optimistic of the planet lasting much longer.
true

also while I can come up with several great fast bowlers who could match Paddles in certain skills of the trade , and a few legends who could surpass him in a few aspects, I still can't come up with anyone who was better than him overall.
 

Migara

International Coach
these kind of arguments will go on till the world ends; with mcgrath comfortably winning the battle for tests and akram marginally for ODIs.

On the day the world ends, when all arguments have to be locked forever, Sir Richard Hadlee is likely to go down in eternity as the greatest fast bowler of all time, all things considered.
McGrath better in both.
 

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
But again, doesn't that speak slightly towards them just being part of the best teams?
Yes them being that good is also WHY their teams were so good, but their teams were also very good outside of those players.
this is a strange argument. great players make great teams. great teams dont make players better than they are
 

smash84

The Tiger King
this is a strange argument. great players make great teams. great teams dont make players better than they are
Great teams do make the jobs of individual players somewhat easier though. They can feed off the great players around and perform better than if they were to be put into a team of school boys (for example).
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Great teams do make the jobs of individual players somewhat easier though. They can feed off the great players around and perform better than if they were to be put into a team of school boys (for example).
I think this applies to support players more than the great players. I don't think McGrath, Warne, Gilchrist or Ponting would have done any worse for weaker sides. But it would be easier for a young Michael Clarke type to come in to an ATG team and perform straight away
 

smash84

The Tiger King
Murali did for SL and they were a joke at test level for large parts of his career.
They weren't really a joke though. They had some pretty capable batsmen who could put scoreboard pressure on the opposition. Plus he had other decent bowlers like Vaas through most of his career.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Assuming the zimbos would get enough shots at the tail.
eh it's all pretty hypothetical. There'd be a lot of factors involved.

eg. another potential factor, Aus rarely played weaker teams during McGrath's time. If he instead played for someone like Sri Lanka who played a quarter of their games against minnows he could have averaged sub-20. Murali benefited significantly from this.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
They weren't really a joke though. They had some pretty capable batsmen who could put scoreboard pressure on the opposition. Plus he had other decent bowlers like Vaas through most of his career.
They were as likely to win test series back then as Zimbabwe with Streak & Flower though.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I don't think SL were much better than Zim but Sri Lanka could doctor pitches at home against non-Asian sides to give them a pretty decent advantage. Zim didn't have that option.
 

Top