Slifer
International Captain
Oh so you started watching around 2001ish??i saw walsh at the very end in the sinclair 214 match, one of the first tests i ever watched.
haven't seen ambrose, or if i have i don't remember it.
Oh so you started watching around 2001ish??i saw walsh at the very end in the sinclair 214 match, one of the first tests i ever watched.
haven't seen ambrose, or if i have i don't remember it.
yeah somewhere in the 1999 - 2001 bracket. my earliest cricket memories are craig mcmillan bowling at the death and getting pasted in a random odi, mathew sinclair bringing up his double on debut and the 2001 australian tour.Oh so you started watching around 2001ish??
This is an obvious insult at @BurgeyWho is the next in line senior citizen here after JBMAC?
It’s a joke as old as time itselfOh look, a barely original thought. Who'd have guessed that was coming.
I juz want the weekly references to match your age ?It's not the age of it so much as HB is incapable of turning it down to less than about a dozen references a week.
If it's 12 references per week then you've matched your IQ, so kudos and all.
It's nice to be the object someone's obsession,
Are you saying that the more references to your age the higher IQ? Reasonable opinion.If it's 12 references per week then you've matched your IQ, so kudos and all.
Using the 28 average would be more accurate, if indeed that was what he averaged as a seamer, which btw I have no reason to doubt.A bowling average of 25 would bring Sobers very near to Don Bradman as a cricketer with every body else comfortably far behind.
Yeah. The great Khali.Sobers and khallis where freaks, I didn't see sobers live or in replay, but the legend around him is insane. He's like what would happen if smith was the freak of a bat he is while also having kept up his leg-spin full time and becoming a nathan lyon tier bowler while also being a freak of a slip fielder.
Khallis was just untouchable, wasn't extremely flashy with the bat but he was just so mechanical, knew how to make an attack suffer, also has just under 300 test wickets at a brett lee esque average and is one of the best fielders in the history of the game.
:oKhallis was just untouchable, wasn't extremely flashy with the bat but he was just so mechanical, knew how to make an attack suffer, also has just under 300 test wickets at a brett lee esque average and is one of the best fielders in the history of the game.
Really? My dad always described him as a level above anyone in that peak sa team in the field including AB, and he has the internation catches to back that up, may have been hyperboly:o
he was a solid slipper but this is a stretch