• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* World Test Championship Final 2021

Who do you think will win it?


  • Total voters
    70
  • Poll closed .

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
I really don't see what's so bad about Gill's technique. Yes, he drives on the up a fair bit but I don't think there's much technically wrong with his batting and think he looks decently suited to opening, particularly on the faster pitches.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I really don't see what's so bad about Gill's technique. Yes, he drives on the up a fair bit but I don't think there's much technically wrong with his batting and think he looks decently suited to opening, particularly on the faster pitches.
It's more the fact that he stays so leg side of the ball when he's playing off the back foot that make people cringe a bit, I think. It's not the fact that he drives length balls.

I like his technique a lot and more or less agree with you but he's got those two or three shots that make you think of a bad Herschelle Gibbs dismissal.
 

Jack1

International Debutant
there are plenty of ****tier techniques in world cricket. His problem is more between the ears.
His is the worst I can think of for a good batsman. He makes Steven Smith look like Ian Bell. He makes Rory Burns look like David Gower.

Technique is irrelevant to me (other than aesthetically), doesn't mean a player will or won't get runs. Was just saying.
 

Flem274*

123/5
It's more the fact that he stays so leg side of the ball when he's playing off the back foot that make people cringe a bit, I think. It's not the fact that he drives length balls.

I like his technique a lot and more or less agree with you but he's got those two or three shots that make you think of a bad Herschelle Gibbs dismissal.
yeah he does push out at the ball as well which is suicide in NZ, SA and England if you're an opener but he's much less pronounced than say, Kohli or Rohit.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I really don't see what's so bad about Gill's technique. Yes, he drives on the up a fair bit but I don't think there's much technically wrong with his batting and think he looks decently suited to opening, particularly on the faster pitches.
He also doesn't move his feet a whole lot. It's what gives the illusion that he has a lot of time to play the ball.

Overall though yeah there's nothing there you'd say is 'bad'.
 

Jack1

International Debutant
yeah he does push out at the ball as well which is suicide in NZ, SA and England if you're an opener but he's much less pronounced than say, Kohli or Rohit.
Depends how well you execute what you're doing. You can make runs with any technique if you execute the shots well enough. Gill isn't very experienced only 30 FC games. Not a great sample size, hard to know what he would average in FC after 200 games.
 

Arachnodouche

International Captain
His is the worst I can think of for a good batsman. He makes Steven Smith look like Ian Bell. He makes Rory Burns look like David Gower.

Technique is irrelevant to me (other than aesthetically), doesn't mean a player will or won't get runs. Was just saying.
Ok you've got me chasing my own tail here lol. I think he's aesthetically the most pleasing batsman I've seen since Laxman and Inzy retired, but that counts for little overall. His technique in terms of effectiveness is not the worst either, but it's the lapses in concentration that let him down usually.
 

Moss

International Captain
Boult's been noticeably less good since returning from injury for Boxing Day
This would be a great time obviously to turn it around, but if NZ play two specialist spinners in India, he probably shouldn’t not be an automatic starter given the way he’s been bowling.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
This would be a great time obviously to turn it around, but if NZ play two specialist spinners in India, he probably shouldn’t not be an automatic starter given the way he’s been bowling.
He should probably be an automatic non-starter in that situation tbh.
 

Flem274*

123/5
This would be a great time obviously to turn it around, but if NZ play two specialist spinners in India, he probably shouldn’t not be an automatic starter given the way he’s been bowling.
Southee's our best pacer in the subcontinent and Wagner is endurance personified, so I tend to agree.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Yeah pull him. Can't be wasting the new rock on full tosses and leg side trash. Bring him back after Southee/Jamieson imo.
 

Top