True, if there are others among IPL players then I’m happy to acknowledge them. It’s not a competition I follow closely.It is possible that Sams' case is simply the first Burgey's heard about
Well, at least he is being direct. You wrap your hatred, biases, etc. in cricket-related comments. He is clearly telling you what he thinks about your post(s), you tend to do the same things in a very indirect way(whether its a comment related to a cricket web poster, cricketer or country).Would prefer the plural noun to be fora (benefits of a classical education).
You seem to also have a very loose notion of what an “exchange of ideas” is. Read the bloke’s posts this afternoon, they’re embarrassing and there’s not an idea in them. Just random, unbidden insults. If I was a like-minded sensitive blancmange I’d have reported them, or even sent an email to his employer as is his wont.
You can hear the snap, crackle and pop of brain cells dying across the world as people endure reading those posts. Woeful.
I don’t think anyone who’s been here longer than five minutes would suggest I’m indirect. Fmd I think that’s the first time in 15 years I’ve been called that on this site.Well, at least he is being direct. You wrap your hatred, biases, etc. in cricket-related comments. He is clearly telling you what he thinks about your post(s), you tend to do the same things in a very indirect way(whether its a comment related to a cricket web poster, cricketer or country).
I don’t think anyone who’s been here longer than five minutes would suggest I’m indirect. Fmd I think that’s the first time in 15 years I’ve been called that on this site.
HB is well aware I can’t stand him. I’ve hardly made a secret of it. To suggest otherwise is an outrageous slur.
Well, at least he is being direct. You wrap your hatred, biases, etc. in cricket-related comments. He is clearly telling you what he thinks about your post(s), you tend to do the same things in a very indirect way(whether its a comment related to a cricket web poster, cricketer or country).
It is possible that Sams' case is simply the first Burgey's heard about
Take back my original post if this is indeed true. But there has been a few who have tested positive and it seemed rather insensitive of you to frame it that way.True, if there are others among IPL players then I’m happy to acknowledge them. It’s not a competition I follow closely.
HB was just being typically over sensitive and carried on like a pork chop. Standard stuff.What the hell happened here
@ that post.HB was just being typically over sensitive and carried on like a pork chop. Standard stuff.
Out of interest, who else has the spicy cough?
No crowds! All business will try to find a way to run no matter what the situation is.If anything the fact this tournament is happening at all during this pandemic in a country so affected by the virus is the ethically questionable aspect. People could literally die because sports. But somehow a comment that (very obliquely) hinted at this issue is the one that is the "insensitive" post. What wormhole have I gone down.
Ftr the post I made wasn’t hinting at that at all. I hadn’t heard of anyone connected with the IPL being infected. Like I said, it’s not a tournament I follow at all these days. I did the first couple of years but then there was no coverage here for a few years and by the time it was available here I had a combo of not caring about it and the time zone not being conducive to sleep.But somehow a comment that (very obliquely) hinted at this issue is the one that is the "insensitive" post
yeah this is true, but it doesn't make it not morally oblique to say the least right?No crowds! All business will try to find a way to run no matter what the situation is.
England played cricket at the peak of the pandemic and Australia went there. I think you guys are misunderstanding this. It is about how strong and secure the bio bubbles are and the SOPs are. As far as these two hold good, the league going on with no spectators should not be an issue. And of course, they may feel more confident having successfully run an IPL just few months ago.yeah this is true, but it doesn't make it not morally oblique to say the least right?
the nfl was able to go ahead during the height of the pandemic in the usa, because like the ipl they're Too Big To Fail, don't care about their athletes' safety if you can put a piece of paper with enough zeroes in front of them, and gutted the world's supplies of remdesivir. the nhl is having major pandemic issues and has had multiple teams have to just pause their seasons because of covid outbreaks, the latest, vancouver, very up the junction with it all. VIVO IPL(tm), to say the least, is not an institution i'd say will put player welfare before profit though. leagues here such as the nrl and afl took a very very ubercautious approach to the pandemic, and arguably their hands were forced by state governments. but there are conditions where sports can get played and conditions where they shoudn't and you'd have to put the ipl in the latter category for mine at least tbh
Nope, but **** it, who cares. I am bored of this discussion. Let's discuss about this:Karan, The two comments you’ve highlighted prove exactly the opposite of your point
ok that's great but remember how this discussions started. Players themselves have already tested positive! Whatever precautions, bubbles, no crowds blah blah blah clearly isn't enough to excuse all risk.No crowds! All business will try to find a way to run no matter what the situation is.