Pup Clarke
Cricketer Of The Year
Still don't really rate Thakur. He has skills but don't see him thriving in international cricket for too long
Agree. He'd be an absolute superstar fifth / sixth bowler - like Ben Stokes but he's not good enough to be a frontline pacer in ODIs.Still don't really rate Thakur. He has skills but don't see him thriving in international cricket for too long
It is not fair to him to keep playing him - it is actually irresponsible to do so for his own mental wellbeing.Of course we win off a Kuldeep misfield. Perfectly scripted.
He has the 4th highest Average and has by far the best Strike Rate (Min 500 runs).Lol WTF . Best Opener in ODI history ?
He is yet to reach even top 5 in ICC ODI rankings history. His highest batting ranking is 7 in his entire career which he reached in last game.
Well he averages 75 in 8 ODIs (3 100s) against the best ODI bowling attack of the modern era (NZ).He is yet to reach even top 5 in ICC ODI rankings history. His highest batting ranking is 7 in his entire career which he reached in last game.
Imagine trying to say someone ATG ODI opener when he has never been even in top 5 in his entire career.
These runs on flat decks against C grade attack is meaningless.
We need Shaw as our opener. A top order of Dhawan/Rohit/Kohli simply won't cut out in modern game. Time to drop Dhawan.Sometimes a loss is better than a win and for our long term ODI outlook, I feel this loss was better than a win. Hopefully some tough decisions are taken. But what will end up happening now is that they will replace the two spinners with Washy and Chahar/Chahal and just hope they do better. Which they might well do and help us win the next game, but we need 7 bowling options including Hardik for LO cricket and as long as that is not taken care of, there is no point in raking up the 100s.
I would be more adventurous than that.We need Shaw as our opener. A top order of Dhawan/Rohit/Kohli simply won't cut out in modern game. Time to drop Dhawan.
don't expect a paradigm change in the way we bat with the current tm and it's philosophy, it's like they have a case of late stage Dhoni-itis but when batting first. A lot of things need to go our way when we defend totals against a lineup that are always willing to go hell for leather and are capable of sustaining it.Sometimes a loss is better than a win and for our long term ODI outlook, I feel this loss was better than a win. Hopefully some tough decisions are taken. But what will end up happening now is that they will replace the two spinners with Washy and Chahar/Chahal and just hope they do better. Which they might well do and help us win the next game, but we need 7 bowling options including Hardik for LO cricket and we also need to be able to post 350+ regularly batting first. As long as those are not taken care of, there is no point in raking up the 100s.
Best ODI bowling attack who haven't won a ODI series in IND, AUS , SA , ENG , SL in last 6 years?Well he averages 75 in 8 ODIs (3 100s) against the best ODI bowling attack of the modern era (NZ).
KOHLI is miles better ODI batsman than Viv Richards. Can't hide from the stat if you take it without context.Bairstow is an ATG opener in odis without a doubt and arguably the best ever. Can’t hide from the stats.
His ODI record is way better than Laker's.Is Axar Patel a better spinner than Laker, Underwood ?
I was talking about tests because some people are literally comparing average across eras without taking into consideration the quality of bowling attack, nature of pitch, change in ODI rules which has literally made ODI cricket a batting shootout contest in last 6 -7 years.His ODI record is way better than Laker's.