Spark
Global Moderator
This is not really what happened.In Adelaide, one session of pitch assisting the home side with a lot of swing robbed India a strong position in that test that far.
This is not really what happened.In Adelaide, one session of pitch assisting the home side with a lot of swing robbed India a strong position in that test that far.
Yeah, we got bowled out in the afternoon session, FFS. That pitch remained the same but it was a one in a million confluence of great bowling, every ball taking the edge and carrying and every catch being taken, and there being few, almost no, plays and misses etc.This is not really what happened
Right, the actual pitch was, if anything, still pretty decent to bat on, with maybe a little bit of seam and extra but still consistent bounce. It was a mixture of godly bowling, ungodly bad luck in terms of nicking everything rather than playing and missing, and no batsmen really counterattacking which led to 36ao.Yeah, we got bowled out in the afternoon session, FFS. That pitch remained the same but it was a one in a million confluence of great bowling, every ball taking the edge and carrying and every catch being taken, and there being few, almost no, plays and misses etc.
this is actually a more likely form of pitch tampering/damaging than a bloke absent-mindedly running down the middle of the pitch for three feet tbh. that helmet bouncing around is going to leave a few divots!
theatrics all the way.. he just can't keep away from doing something to attract cameras on him, all the time ?Oh Kohli definitely knows what he's doing. If it doesnt affect the pitch, he's doing it for the cameras. Chutiya behaviour either way.
Ok just look at how many test matches finished in 2 days in SENA pitches..this is actually a more likely form of pitch tampering/damaging than a bloke absent-mindedly running down the middle of the pitch for three feet tbh. that helmet bouncing around is going to leave a few divots!
okOk just look at how many test matches finished in 2 days in SENA pitches..
How are these "good" pitches? It is actually biased against "batting" itself.. It only matters how many "swing" and "pace"bowlers you have and how much you can take advantage of that.. In comparison, this pitch is giving more a balanced field for batters, If you have skill (rohit), you can a play a longer innings and score or if you have the guts (pant) go out and hit them out of the park. In a seaming/swinging lawns, what chance the batsman have.. The pitches there are more dangerous (physically) a raising ball can break some bones even killing some body.. No body blames those pitches and a pitch that turns a bit more is so "dangerous"? just doesn't look right..Records | Test matches | Team records | Shortest matches (by days) | ESPNcricinfo.com
Statsguru, ESPNCricinfo's searchable cricket statistics databasestats.espncricinfo.com
Except its not in the danger area....this is actually a more likely form of pitch tampering/damaging than a bloke absent-mindedly running down the middle of the pitch for three feet tbh. that helmet bouncing around is going to leave a few divots!
What? He bounced it on a goodish length.Except its not in the danger area....
3 feet from the stumps is where the danger area starts, its how its defined.What? He bounced it on a goodish length.
Yeah, for a spinner, but because of how the bowler's run ups happen and how batsmen start running, that is not considered the danger area. It. always starts from that 3 feet from the stumps/crease (forgot which one).Lol it's literally a short of a good length on middle