My theory was Australia wanted to survive until lunch and then go for it. But yes, given how comfortable Smith attacking looked after lunch he could've afforded to be more proactive.I recall someone criticised me for bagging out Smith for blocking endlessly. I don't understand what the difference between before lunch and after lunch when he came out attacking was.
We simply should have won more series obviously. What's that? We didn't play many? Well ****So we get sawn off again on a dodgy tiebreaker, despite flogging ‘em
Hope he is fit for the test, if Ravi is out no fifth bowler of any use unless Rohit counts.Vihari surely buys himself a nice run after this innings. Playing this long despite being injured....
lucky our next in is neser and not john hastingsThe good news for Australia is their bowlers are still (superficially) fit. Back in 2012/13 the du Plessis innings literally rubbed out the entire pace attack (Siddle, Hilfenhaus, Pattinson) from the next test. So in that sense there's a clear distinction to that series, where South Africa absolutely crushed Australia in the decider. Hope I haven't jinxed it.
Wait, what? This seems unlikely. I'm sure they've had a few here.India hadn't had a 20 over partnership outside Asia in 10 years and then had 3 this very game, including that 43 over one.
This surely can't be trueIndia hadn't had a 20 over partnership outside Asia in 10 years and then had 3 this very game, including that 43 over one.
Would be harsh to drop Lyon after such a spinners' graveyard pitch tbh. #SCGnoSpinnytragic, nathan lyon is gonna be dropped before his 100th test
Ok. This is an artist’s sketch of an Indian fan during an overseas tour for most of the past 80 years.Happy to hear about them in 36 words or less.
ash should wish him on twitter/insta lmaoIs that the most perfect way to celebrate Rahul Dravid's birthday or what?
well that's wrong first of allIndia hadn't had a 20 over partnership outside Asia in 10 years and then had 3 this very game, including that 43 over one.
I could've botched it but I think the last one was in 2010.Wait, what? This seems unlikely. I'm sure they've had a few here.
Yeah they created plenty enough chances to win tbh.My theory was Australia wanted to survive until lunch and then go for it. But yes, given how comfortable Smith attacking looked after lunch he could've afforded to be more proactive.
Even so 130 overs is plenty of time to bowl someone out.
I would be immensely surprised if Kohli/Rahane at the MCG in 2014 was under 20 overs.I could've botched it but I think the last one was in 2010.