The Hutt Rec
International Vice-Captain
Watling with a couple of stink reviews this test as well.
What'd he say?Aww. Sumo's been reading or hearing his bad reviews.
Other way round, I reckon ... Jamieson MOTM, Williamson Series.Another one for Jamieson
Giving him the MoTS and Williamson the MoTM would be a fair compromise I reckon, though both deserve both awards.
Definitely a chance IMO. Wagner was already bowling beautifully and Southee put in some excellent spells too. Jamieson in this form would have been a handful. As India have shown, if you're bowling them out for 200 rather than 400 in the first innings, even with a crap batting lineup, you only need one or two guys to stand up to jag a Test win.If Jamieson played the Australia series last season would NZ have won a test? I suspect not given how poorly we batted but it's intriguing to think how he would have fared given how much more effective he seems than the rest of the attack atm.
Jamieson's got 55% of the wickets. Kane only got about 36% of NZ's runs.... no brainer....The Williamson-Jamieson contest for MoTM is the most interesting thing about this match, Kane brought himself on for a cheap tailend wicket.