Isn't it always? Centre of the cricketing world since test #1.i mean... if the bar is performances against australia...
Yeah but two things count against him. 1) he's English and 2) he's English. I know that's technically the same thing but it's such an important point that it was worth mentioning twice.Anderson has taken 450 wickets in the low 20's over the past 10 years.
It depends on what the "zero" reference point of the waveform on screen is. If it's the centre or the left end (which is how waveforms are often displayed on oscilloscopes or graphs) then the spike appearing on the right side before the ball passes the bat shouldn't matter.i mean, sound doesn't travel backwards in time. if a sound has appeared before the ball has reached the bat, then...
Fair, but I'm basically answering the question "Who will do better in a great pace attack with Cummins and Steyn already there across all conditions" - and Rabada gets the nod over Anderson for thatoh sure but that doesn't mean he gets a free pass into a team of the decade. his actual output has actually reduced substantially since that series.
Lord Harris or Marcus Harris?Any true cricket expert makes room for Harris. Otherwise you're just a filthy casual.
i had always assumed that the reference point was the left edge, anchored on the previous frame, and the waveform represents all sounds received in the interval between the two frames. happy to be corrected if wrong though, i'm not aware of anything that says it's presented in the same manner as a standard oscilloscope.It depends on what the "zero" reference point of the waveform on screen is. If it's the centre or the left end (which is how waveforms are often displayed on oscilloscopes or graphs) then the spike appearing on the right side before the ball passes the bat shouldn't matter.
okay but then you're no longer really picking a team of the decade imo. otherwise you'd pick bumrah over either.Fair, but I'm basically answering the question "Who will do better in a great pace attack with Cummins and Steyn already there" - and Rabada gets the nod over Anderson for that
I don't know either, just saying that could be a reason. The sampling rate of audio will be much higher than video so you will see instances of audio show up for events missing in video.i had always assumed that the reference point was the left edge, anchored on the previous frame, and the waveform represents all sounds received in the interval between the two frames. happy to be corrected if wrong though, i'm not aware of anything that says it's presented in the same manner as a standard oscilloscope.
in fairness, these two have better techniques than half of those batting above them.Sneaky good partnership this. Shockingly without any real intent.
Doesn’t occur to you they’re playing for stumps?Sneaky good partnership this. Shockingly without any real intent.
Why does that change anything. Its working now, it can work at any point in the innings.Doesn’t occur to you they’re playing for stumps?
Where is Burns?Chandrika
Jennings
Quiney
Vince
Root (c)
Cartwright
Sarfaraz (k)
Hastings
Kerrigan
Vinay Kumar
Anderson
For my worst team of the decade
i mean, "playing for stumps" does actually count as intent, i.e. having An Idea In MindWhy does that change anything. Its working now, it can work at any point in the innings.
Rory hasn't been all that bad tbqhWhere is Burns?