145 in that article is garbage.From what I saw Green looked about high 130s last time I saw him, so certainly sharp but 145 may be overcooking things a bit. But more than pace what really stood out to me is his ability to swing the ball away while still hitting the deck and getting extra bounce, just looks like the sort of bowling that can get class batsman out, always thought it would be his main skill longterm up until quite recently
My opinion has probably shifted a touch, initially I really wanted him to be bowling at full capacity before being considered, but the more I think just the ability to bowl a handful of overs as a change bowler is sufficient if he keeps making runs.
As for the SA v TAS game, that was just painful. Sayers was class but he recieved minimal support, KRichardson was good in bursts but Agar was underwhelming, Pope far too inconsistent and the fielding simply lacking energy. Depressing but I can't really see any solution. Franky Worrall might be of assistance but he is still a couple of weeks off, Mennie still in England for the indefinite future, grade stocks thin as ever. May be a touch of a risk but I would seriously consider looking to get Tim Oakley into the setup, got wheels for days
I've been at the nets and seen a gun on him and he was bowling around 137kph as a 17 year old. Like I said, once he's mid 20's, add 5kph, so he's probably a low 140kph bowler at test level. But he's years away from that.
Why do we have to wait for his bowling? There's a middle order position up for grabs and he finished 4th in the SS runs tally last year and is currently top of it this year. He is averaging 54 in FC cricket with the bat.Still of the opinion that it's better in the long term to wait until he's bowling fully to make him a fixture in the national team, but giving him a game in a potential dead rubber 4th test vs India as a batsman to get him used to the setup could be a good idea, also means he's eligible for county stuff, which will only help his development.
If he never bowled or was just a part timer, we wouldn't even be questioning it.
It's going to be good for once introducing an actual middle order batsman into the middle order, without having to frankenstein a top order batsmen into #5 or #6.
He seems like an ideal test #6, much like Stokes when he first started concentrating on his batting.