Marshall was more like Steyn than Akhtar/Lee. Steyn never needed to break bones, he swung it late at brisk speeds and bowled out batting line ups. Marshall also bowled inswing which Steyn never had.Both had that slingy javelin throw thing going for them. Definitely harder to pick than Lee and Holding. Marshall's quick arm must've been a nightmare too.
Andy Roberts at 99.1 and no thommo?
7 fastest balls bowled in international cricket
1 Shoaib Akhtar 100.2mph
2 Shaun Tait 100.1mph
3 Brett Lee 100.1mph
4 Mitchell Starc 99.7mph
5 Andy Roberts 99.1mph
6 Fidel Edwards 98.0mph
7 Mitchell Johnson 97.4mph
Thomson was clocked at 99.7 vs West Indies in 1976. I don't know how accurate that speed is, though it's probably as accurate as Roberts'.
7 fastest balls bowled in international cricket
1 Shoaib Akhtar 100.2mph
2 Shaun Tait 100.1mph
3 Brett Lee 100.1mph
4 Mitchell Starc 99.7mph
5 Andy Roberts 99.1mph
6 Fidel Edwards 98.0mph
7 Mitchell Johnson 97.4mph
Why not? He is clearly capable of 150+ , surely a one-off delivery can be faster.There's no way Starc bowled a 99.7 mph
It's probably as accurate as Lee's fastest, which frankly looked like a medium paced half tracker compared to a lot of balls he bowled. The batsman had about a year and a half to decide whether or not to leave it.There's no way Starc bowled a 99.7 mph
Tbf I don't think an attack of Marshall, Hadlee, Ambrose and Murali would have stopped Clarke back then. Bloke was in the form of his life.The speed gun charm wore off for me after Michael Clarke's 329* against us. It was painful to watch Ishant and Umesh Yadav averaging 144 k's yet getting carted away like county trundlers.
That's a bit of a stretch. But yes, he did score a gun 151 on a difficult track against a South African attack at it's prime.Tbf I don't think an attack of Marshall, Hadlee, Ambrose and Murali would have stopped Clarke back then. Bloke was in the form of his life.
That bouncer he bowls to Sachin where it jags back in towards his head as he ducks but then gets bat on it - speed gun says 142. It looked WAY WAY faster than a lot of balls that go 150+.It's probably as accurate as Lee's fastest, which frankly looked like a medium paced half tracker compared to a lot of balls he bowled. The batsman had about a year and a half to decide whether or not to leave it.
Yeah, though tbh Clarke's god mode is up there with about anyone else but Lara's since I've been watching.The speed gun charm wore off for me after Michael Clarke's 329* against us. It was painful to watch Ishant and Umesh Yadav averaging 144 k's yet getting carted away like county trundlers.