shane gower
Cricket Spectator
.438 seconds from the time it left Thompson’s hand to reaching the bat that’s lightning fast flem
Depends if you're looking at Thommo pre or post shoulder injury. Thommo looked nothing special post injury.None of the pre-1990s bowlers look truly express to me apart from Thomson , and I dont think even he looks quite as quick.
Yeah that game in Sri Lanka against Aus where he went on a tear and bowled Gilchrist...I really can't imagine a cricket ball being bowled faster than that, speed meters be damned. It was so quick it almost had a foreshortening effect on the wicket. Mind you, this wasn't the pure athlete Shoaib of his first three years on the scene, he was getting to be more brute force by then, but still scary quick.Gotta be Shoaib. Spells like these where there wasnt any extravagant movement and he simply beat players with sheer pace repeatedly were incredible to watch. None of the pre-1990s bowlers look truly express to me apart from Thomson , and I dont think even he looks quite as quick.
Pretty useless bowler if he's regularly giving away 7 wides.Thompson would hit the pitch then the sight screen on the full on a regular basis he was quicker than lee
Look at where Marsh was taking those balls. If nothing else Thomson got crazy amounts of lift, even off a length. But it's a bit silly to imply he wasn't ridiculously quick. Even if he was fractionally slower than Ahktar, his action ensured he was perceived as faster by the batsman.
Thommo pre-injury. Akhtar faster for my money.
That is just an assumption here by you, given no two batsmen have faced both these guys. And if anything, I think Shoaib's long run up and his busy action will make him seem quicker than Thommo IMO.Even if he was fractionally slower than Ahktar, his action ensured he was perceived as faster by the batsman.
Jafra Archer manage to hit the off bail and send the ball over the boundary without bouncing. That was at 89mph. So no need even to be 90+ to do it if the conditions are good enough.What annoys me about experts when they're asked is that they'll mention the blokes they faced. Benaud will say Tyson, Richards will say Thommo etc. I've seen enough of Holding and Thommo to say I think it's just Thommo. There was a story that he once played on the Perth ground, bowled a wild bouncer that flew over everybody's head, and it hit the white board without bouncing! Apparently it scared people.
You can watch clips of Tyson on TV... but the quality of footage doesn't indicate enough.
The reason for the speed discrepency was that Thommo bowled yorkers and full tosses (which was not his norm), while others bowled shorter stuff. Some one must have told how to register higher speeds on the gun!There was a little segment on the cricket show earlier this summer about a speed contest they had back in the 1970's in the nets at Perth, they got the fastest 7 or 8 bowlers of that era n lined em up in front of a speed gun for an over each I think it was.
I dont know how reliable the speedo was but I remember Thompson won it but his fastest delivery was only recorded in the high 140's ...and noboddy else was really close to him.
It seems pretty unreliable given that it wasnt a match situation and they werent given a whole lot of deliveries...but still...That would imply that if that was anywhere near accurate then Lee...Shoaib...Donald...Bond were at their respective peaks significantly quicker than the fastest of yesteryear.
Love how his Cricinfo bio reads like one from PakpassionFastest was Mohammed Zahid. Even Akthar admits him to be a yard quicker. Hitting 145-150k with a broken back, shows what man have been before the injury.
That spell against an ATG batting lineup was just incredible. Searing pace with reverse swing. Just incredible.Yeah that game in Sri Lanka against Aus where he went on a tear and bowled Gilchrist...I really can't imagine a cricket ball being bowled faster than that, speed meters be damned. It was so quick it almost had a foreshortening effect on the wicket. Mind you, this wasn't the pure athlete Shoaib of his first three years on the scene, he was getting to be more brute force by then, but still scary quick.