PSA: Setting a small target generally isn’t a great way to win.Yeah this isn't a regular declaration. England have to win to get the trophy back.
You not think 280 is enough ? How long are you batting for and what target would you want us to set ?PSA: Setting a small target generally isn’t a great way to win.
you complain about people edge lording and being snarky for its own sake on the net a lot, and this is an example of your usual manner when you strongly disagree with someone.PSA: Setting a small target generally isn’t a great way to win.
Without checking, whichever year they lost to SL at Headingly and then fell behind top India when Ishant Sharma bounced them out. Maybe 2014? And I can't remember if there was a drawn match at the start of the India series.When did England last lose 2 tests in a row at home?
I don’t remember complaining about snark but fair cop. Didn’t need the ‘PSA’you complain about people edge lording and being snarky for its own sake on the net a lot, and this is an example of your usual manner when you strongly disagree with someone.
tend to your own house first aye
The Sharma 7-for was in the 2nd test, after the draw at TB where Cook took a wicket.Without checking, whichever year they lost to SL at Headingly and then fell behind top India when Ishant Sharma bounced them out. Maybe 2014? And I can't remember if there was a drawn match at the start of the India series.
1st test vs India was a draw, India won the 2ndWithout checking, whichever year they lost to SL at Headingly and then fell behind top India when Ishant Sharma bounced them out. Maybe 2014? And I can't remember if there was a drawn match at the start of the India series.
Don't Chase, Dowrich and Holder have a history of fourth innings rearguards?Most of the Windies lineup is technically and temperamentally unsuited to batting purely for survival. Putting them in a situation that demands exactly that is England's best chance.