Why would there be umpire's call? There's no doubt on where it pitches, either it's inside the line or it isn't.Why is that not umpires call on chase?
Probably just over half the ball outside line of leg.
Can't review that!!
Nah, it's too late to really think they might follow on now. Dowrich now, then Holder and even Roach isn't terrible.30 runs to avoid follow-on.. This could get interesting. But I sense a Holder special.
Think the margin of error on point of impact on the pitch is smaller compared to point of impact on the pad.Because on the other side theres an umpires call for whether the player is LBW. If the ball is a certain amount outside the line umpires call is given in a review.
Surely the same logic applies. Umpire given it out half the ball or slightly less than half the ball was inline.
There's doubt in the exact point of impact where the ball hits the pad because of various non-linear interaction effects between ball and pad which alter the trajectory which make it difficult to determine precisely. You don't have any of that where the ball lands, you know exactly where it was.Because on the other side theres an umpires call for whether the player is LBW. If the ball is a certain amount outside the line umpires call is given in a review.
Surely the same logic applies. Umpire given it out half the ball or slightly less than half the ball was inline.
...umpire's call for offside? What?Only would have to clip the stumps being given out.
We never got to see that. As a percentage that was probably 51% of the ball outside the line of leg stump.
What are the margins for umpires call on the offside and is there an umpires call for the legside?
Why did we stop using hotspot?That’s such a tiny inside edge I refuse to believe it’s the reason for the not out
That’s inhuman
Maybe slightly outside leg, IMHO. Looked to be hitting the stumps.That’s such a tiny inside edge I refuse to believe it’s the reason for the not out
That’s inhuman