Not officially, just had surgery. Fair chance at 33 he may not make his way back however. And he can retire happy with what he achieved for sureHas Mark Craig retired from FC cricket altogether now?
Not officially, just had surgery. Fair chance at 33 he may not make his way back however. And he can retire happy with what he achieved for sureHas Mark Craig retired from FC cricket altogether now?
He was tall by all accounts, so tended to get a bit of lift on unresponsive decks.im a very boring person so im trying to rank my kiwi bowlers. bruce taylor didn't like favourable conditions did he? gunned it in india and the windies but was modest at home and in england. is there any footage of him? it tends to suggest he was bowling the flintoff/morkel length, which makes him so valuable and inspiring on a motorway but not as successful when it's spicy.
i've always been a fan of the guy since hadlee overshadows him as a bowling allrounder.
Yeah, he lost points for me because of his physical fragility (same reason why Bond isn't ranked #2). But in terms of raw talent, he was a fine bowler, His bowling in his last test was one of the best performances I've ever seen for NZ. Mills and Martin both broke down injured. That meant that Cairns only had 125kmh James Franklin, a half fit Jacob Oram and Scott Styris as back up. Yet he ended the test with 9 wickets and bowled with real pace and skill - would've been a matchwinning performance with anything approaching a fully fit bowling attack.i like that group of names too, tho i might have a slightly different order. maybe hadlee, cowie, bond, wagner, the alleged mr x, boult, taylor, southee, collinge, cameron
vettori leads the spinners by miles
was watching test bowling highlights of mr x yesterday. fmd he was amazing once he clicked in test cricket. it's a shame he spent so long injured, he deserved to drag that teenage average further down. an all time very goodTM bowler lost to us.
1965im a very boring person so im trying to rank my kiwi bowlers. bruce taylor didn't like favourable conditions did he? gunned it in india and the windies but was modest at home and in england. is there any footage of him? it tends to suggest he was bowling the flintoff/morkel length, which makes him so valuable and inspiring on a motorway but not as successful when it's spicy.
i've always been a fan of the guy since hadlee overshadows him as a bowling allrounder.
I have both in my recordings collection, the second one is slanted inswinger. I don't think he was that quick, bog ordinary fast-medium sort of speed. Kinda hard to remember since I only saw it once and it's been so long, but he looked (and was) quite unimpressive in 1973, bowling too short on pitches expected to favour him. That was his last series, though he was only 30 and played in FC until 79/80.woah, thanks!
he looks pretty sharp in that second clip, and that ball must have come back viciously.
im kiwi remember, sharp = fast medium, fast = fastI have both in my recordings collection, the second one is slanted inswinger. I don't think he was that quick, bog ordinary fast-medium sort of speed. Kinda hard to remember since I only saw it once and it's been so long, but he looked (and was) quite unimpressive in 1973, bowling too short on pitches expected to favour him. That was his last series, though he was only 30 and played in FC until 79/80.
I thought that was Richard Hadlee in the second clip for a second, had to check because the player looked similar. It was Dayle Hadlee on his debut. Front arm and head were kept a bit straighter in Richard's action.
... his bowling never brought him really spectacular results. But Taylor kept getting wickets - and getting them faster, in terms of overs to wickets, than anyone else in the team [Motz, Cunis, Collinge, Dayle Hadlee were the other seamers]. He had the happy knack of getting an early one or two and his test figures were revealing [8 tests v WI, in Eng, in Ind, in Pak, 24 wickets @ 23.4]. ... His bowling was sometimes very sharp, sometimes a little lackadaisical...
The chapter mentions Dick Motz. Can anyone weigh in on how good he was? Known for being the first kiwi to the 100 wicket mark, and seems to be regarded as NZ's bowler of the 60's (a case could be made for Taylor I suppose though he straddles 2 decades). Based on accounts from my fathers/grandfathers generation he made a favourable impression during his India visit in 64-65. Rated 'fast' by Cricinfo too though that obviously isn't the final word.Dick Brittenden in the 69 tour book makes several comments about Taylor's inconsistency. From the summary chapter:
this is pretty faint praise for a bloke who finished with a career average of 26 which i estimate puts him at the best average of all kiwis except cowie at the time, and easily the best of the 100 wickets club.Dick Brittenden in the 69 tour book makes several comments about Taylor's inconsistency. From the summary chapter:
From Brittenden's 1965 tour book (Ind, Pak, Eng):The chapter mentions Dick Motz. Can anyone weigh in on how good he was? ...
He [Motz] was much more accurate than Collinge or Taylor, more agressive, in a more obvious sense, than Cameron.... He had out-swing at times, but based his attack principally on pace, a little lift, variations in the line of his attack, and his ability to seam the ball on most pitches. He had a significant lead over the other pace bowlers in his percentage of top-order victims.
ta
Possibly...big dig call to rate dick motz, collinge and dayle hadlee higher than bruce taylor (if im reading his subtext correct) given the statistical context. the cynic in me with well known views on cricket writers does wonder if it's a 'tim southee is a better odi bowler than matt henry' call...
The tour books are a good read, can often be found in NZ 2nd hand bookshops for $5 - 10.