• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

DoG's Top 100 Test Batsmen Countdown Thread

ataraxia

International Coach
Hayden rated a bit lower than what I was expecting. Predict Jayawardene next, then Warner, then Inzy.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Incorporating peaks is good because it gives a way of making a directly equivalent comparison between batsmen in terms of straightforward quality over an equal sample size, whereas career averages can and at this level often are weighed down by batsmen being picked too young or by staying on too long, often for reasons entirely outside a batsman's control.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
When talking about longevity, there has to be a provision to factor in what was the average number of tests your team played in that era. Not sure how DoG's formula does this but I assume if something like that were to be done, Kane won't suffer in the longevity stakes against someone like Root that much.
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
Yet to come (32):


West Indies (7): Sobers, Richards, Lara, Headley, Weekes, Walcott, Chanderpaul
Australia (6): Bradman, Chappell, Ponting, Waugh, Smith, Border
England (5): Hobbs, Hutton, Hammond, Suttcliffe, Barrington
India (5): Tendulkar, Gavaskar, Dravid, Kohli, Sehwag
South Africa (4): Pollock, Kallis, de Villiers, Nourse
Pakistan (3): Inzamam, Younis, Yousuf
Sri Lanka (2): Sangakkara, Jaywardene

Nourse must be coming up soon. Had a short career which can't probably carry him too far.
 
Last edited:

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
MoYo > Miandad is very strange. Must've been the peak I suppose but I thought Miandad having much better longevity would've been enough.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Incorporating peaks is good because it gives a way of making a directly equivalent comparison between batsmen in terms of straightforward quality over an equal sample size, whereas career averages can and at this level often are weighed down by batsmen being picked too young or by staying on too long, often for reasons entirely outside a batsman's control.
Fair point
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Miandad's case illustrates your point. He is one of very few (I think 2) batsmen whose average never dropped below 50 throughout their careers.
Headley and Sutcliffe both never did, not sure about anyone else.
"Average not dropping below 50" isn't necessarily an indicator of more consistency is it? It's mainly because they had a good first test/series. Like for Miandad, he had a huge debut series vs NZ which gave him a decent buffer meaning that even after his poor series vs Australia right after , it didn't drop below 50.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I genuinely thought Hayden would be higher given his insane rate of tonning up. Still 33 is pretty good and reflects how immense he was for Australia.
 

Days of Grace

International Captain
"Average not dropping below 50" isn't necessarily an indicator of more consistency is it? It's mainly because they had a good first test/series. Like for Miandad, he had a huge debut series vs NZ which gave him a decent buffer meaning that even after his poor series vs Australia right after , it didn't drop below 50.
The same applies to Worrell, who averaged 104.12 after 7 matches.

Perhaps a high and low average over 50 innings would be interesting but I think the midpoint would be very similar to the career average.
 
Last edited:

Coronis

International Coach
Something I will be interested to see, when Headley and Hammond come up, how their ranking would look if they had never come back after WWII.
 

Top